Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917146›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

An eHealth Prevention Program for Substance Use, Sexual Assault, and Sexual Risk Behaviors for Adolescents in Primary Care: Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Teen Well Check.

Amanda K Gilmore, Kennicia Fortson, K Nicole Mullican, Grisel García-Ramírez, Anna Hutchins, Alyssa M Bartlett, Holly C Gooding, Elizabeth Wallis, Sharon Levy, Kenneth J Ruggiero and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03489434 (Technology-Based Prevention for Adolescents in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03489434 nacompletednot on this map

Technology-Based Prevention for Adolescents in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgia State UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled123ConditionsSubstance UseArmsIntervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda K GilmoreDepartment of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-9206
Kennicia FortsonDepartment of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-1561
K Nicole MullicanDepartment of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-4927
Grisel García-RamírezDepartment of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4969-7297
Anna HutchinsSchool of Social Work, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7549-6644
Alyssa M BartlettSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-6767
Holly C GoodingDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3145-5791
Elizabeth WallisDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3548-3144
Sharon LevyDivision of Addiction Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7353-3161
Kenneth J RuggieroCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-6988
Debra KaysenDivision of Public Mental Health & Population Sciences, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7961-2787
Carla Kmett DanielsonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-5072
Robert PlatnerOld Fourth Ward Pediatrics, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6862-7100
April HartmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6054-6613
Shannon Self-BrownDepartment of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-6948
Georgia State University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USAugusta University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USDuke University · USEmory University · USStanford Medicine · USThe Fourth People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Mentorship and Research in HIV and Addiction Prevention Among Traumatized YouthK24DA039783 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DANIELSON, CARLA KMETT · 2015 to 2025
$1.9M
Technology-Based Prevention for Adolescent Substance Use, Sexual Assault, and Sexual Risk in Primary CareK23DA042935 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GILMORE, AMANDA KATHERINE · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA042935NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA039783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk behaviors are common among adolescents and are interrelated. Nearly 1 in 5 adolescents use substances before sexual encounters, placing these young people at risk for both sexual assault and sexual risk behaviors. Primary care visits present a unique opportunity to address multiple health risk behaviors.

objectiveTeen Well Check is a web-based integrated prevention program for substance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk behaviors with demonstrated usability and acceptability among patients and providers. The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility.

methodsAdolescents (n=123) aged 14 to 18 years from diverse backgrounds were recruited from primarily Medicaid-serving pediatric primary care clinics. Participants completed a baseline survey; were randomized to receive Teen Well Check or an assessment-only control; and completed 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up surveys. Feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment and retention rates. Preliminary changes from baseline to follow-up periods were examined separately in the Teen Well Check and control conditions.

resultsWe recruited 123 participants (Teen Well Check: n=61, 49.6%; control: n=62, 50.4%). Of the 61 participants assigned to the Teen Well Check condition, 55 (90%) completed the full program and viewed all intervention content. Of the 123 participants, 105 (85.4%) were retained across at least 1 follow-up period, and there was no difference in follow-up rates between the conditions (χ

conclusionsThese findings support the feasibility of Teen Well Check delivery within pediatric primary care clinics. A randomized clinical trial is needed to assess efficacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT3489434; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03489434.

Indexed as

adolescentsdrug useeHealthpreventionsexual assaultsexual health

Identifiers

PMID37917146
PMCPMC10654907
OpenAlexW4388233078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.