ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Prediction of Central Visual Field Measures From Macular OCT Volume Scans With Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting HFA 30-2 Visual Fields with Deep Learning from Multimodal OCT-Fundus Feature Fusion and Structure-Function Discordance Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Multicenter OCT-Based Visual Field Representations via Segmentation-Free 3D CNNs: Forecasting, Longitudinal Variability, and Progression Detection.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Effect of Signal-Strength Filtering on 3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Visual Field Estimation From Macular OCT.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Hierarchical Longitudinal Model for Estimation of Central Visual Field Rates of Change in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Automated learning of glaucomatous visual fields from OCT images using a comprehensive, segmentation-free 3D convolutional neural network model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting visual field global and local parameters from OCT measurements using explainable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable Deep Learning for Glaucomatous Visual Field Prediction: Artifact Correction Enhances Transformer Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Applications of deep learning in the analysis of optical coherence tomography images for glaucoma-related diagnostics.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Predict central 10° global and local visual field (VF) measurements from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) volume scans with deep learning (DL). Methods: This study included 1121 OCT volume scans and 10-2 VFs from 289 eyes (257 patients). Macular scans were used to estimate 10-2 VF mean deviation (MD), threshold sensitivities (TS), and total deviation (TD) values at 68 locations. A three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network based on the 3D DenseNet121 architecture was used for prediction. We compared DL predictions to those from baseline linear models. We carried out 10-fold stratified cross-validation to optimize generalizability. The performance of the DL and baseline models was compared based on correlations between ground truth and predicted VF measures and mean absolute error (MAE; ground truth - predicted values). Results: Average (SD) MD was -9.3 (7.7) dB. Average (SD) correlations between predicted and ground truth MD and MD MAE were 0.74 (0.09) and 3.5 (0.4) dB, respectively. Estimation accuracy deteriorated with worsening MD. Average (SD) Pearson correlations between predicted and ground truth TS and MAEs for DL and baseline model were 0.71 (0.05) and 0.52 (0.05) (P < 0.001) and 6.5 (0.6) and 7.5 (0.5) dB (P < 0.001), respectively. For TD, correlation (SD) and MAE (SD) for DL and baseline models were 0.69 (0.02) and 0.48 (0.05) (P < 0.001) and 6.1 (0.5) and 7.8 (0.5) dB (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Macular OCT volume scans can be used to predict global central VF parameters with clinically relevant accuracy. Translational Relevance: Macular OCT imaging may be used to confirm and supplement central VF findings using deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.