Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37916814›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Prevalence and Source Tracing of PFAS in Shallow Groundwater Used for Drinking Water in Wisconsin, USA.

Matthew Silver, William Phelps, Kevin Masarik, Kyle Burke, Chen Zhang, Alex Schwartz, Miaoyan Wang, Amy L Nitka, Jordan Schutz, Tom Trainor and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew SilverBureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater─Groundwater Section, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0718-571X
William PhelpsBureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater─Groundwater Section, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.
Kevin MasarikCenter for Watershed Science and Education, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin─Stevens Point, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481, United States.
Kyle BurkeEnvironmental Health Division─Organics, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.
Chen ZhangEnvironmental Health Division─Organics, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.
Alex SchwartzEnvironmental Health Division─Organics, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.
Miaoyan WangDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.
Amy L NitkaCenter for Watershed Science and Education, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin─Stevens Point, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481, United States.
Jordan SchutzBureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater─Groundwater Section, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.
Tom TrainorBureau of Environmental Analysis and Sustainability - Laboratory Certification, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54313, United States.
John W WashingtonCenter for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia 30605, United States.
Bruce D RheineckBureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater─Groundwater Section, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Samples from 450 homes with shallow private wells throughout the state of Wisconsin (USA) were collected and analyzed for 44 individual per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), general water quality parameters, and indicators of human waste as well as agricultural influence. At least one PFAS was detected in 71% of the study samples, and 22 of the 44 PFAS analytes were detected in one or more samples. Levels of PFOA and/or PFOS exceeded the proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels of 4 ng/L, put forward by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in March 2023, in 17 of the 450 samples, with two additional samples containing PFHxS ≳ 9 ng/L (the EPA-proposed hazard index reference value). Those samples above the referenced PFAS levels tend to be associated with developed land and human waste indicators (artificial sweeteners and pharmaceuticals), which can be released to groundwater via septic systems. For a few samples with levels of PFOA, PFOS, and/or PFHxS > 40 ng/L, application of wastes to agricultural land is a possible source. Overall, the study suggests that human waste sources, septic systems in particular, are important sources of perfluoroalkyl acids, especially ones with ≤8 perfluorinated carbons, in shallow groundwater.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsDrinking WaterFluorocarbonsGroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalHumansPrevalenceWisconsinAlkanesulfonic AcidsDrinking WaterFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemicalagricultural sourcesemerging contaminantshuman waste sourcesPFAS occurrenceseptic system effluentsource water protectionwaste land application

Identifiers

PMID37916814
PMCPMC10653221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.