Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37916805›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2023

Pathogenic Germline Variants in BRCA1/2 and p53 Identified by Real-world Comprehensive Cancer Genome Profiling Tests in Asian Patients.

Tomoyuki Satake, Shunsuke Kondo, Noriko Tanabe, Takaaki Mizuno, Yuki Katsuya, Jun Sato, Takafumi Koyama, Tatsuya Yoshida, Makoto Hirata, Noboru Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoyuki SatakeDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-7738
Shunsuke KondoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-117X
Noriko TanabeGenetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8240-007X
Takaaki MizunoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4642-0345
Yuki KatsuyaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-3601
Jun SatoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-6522
Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5807-8458
Tatsuya YoshidaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-5824
Makoto HirataGenetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-9958
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-2851
National Cancer Centre Japan · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

N/A N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer genome profiling (CGP) occasionally identifies pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in cancer susceptibility genes (CSG) as secondary findings. Here, we analyzed the prevalence and clinical characteristics of PGVs based on nationwide real-world data from CGP tests in Japan. We analyzed the genomic information and clinical characteristics of 23,928 patients with solid cancers who underwent either tumor-only (n = 20,189) or paired tumor-normal (n = 3,739) sequencing CGP tests between June 2019 and December 2021 using the comprehensive national database. We assigned clinical significance for all variants and highlighted the prevalence and characteristics of PGVs. Our primary analysis of the tumor-normal sequencing cohort revealed that 152 patients (4.1%) harbored PGVs in 15 CSGs. Among 783 germline variants, 113 were annotated as PGVs, 70 as benign variants, and 600 as variants of uncertain significance. The number of PGVs identified was highest in BRCA1/2, with 56, followed by TP53, with 18. PGVs were the most prevalent in ovarian and peritoneal cancers, including among cancer types common in Asia. In the tumor-only sequencing cohort, of the 5,184 pathogenic somatic variants across 26 CSGs, 784 (15.1%) were extracted according to the European Society for Medical Oncology recommendations for germline-focused tumor analysis. The prevalence of PGVs was similar to that previously reported in Europe and the United States. This is the largest analysis based on real-world tumor-normal sequencing tests in Asia. The more widespread use of the tumor-normal sequencing CGP test could be reasonable for evaluating PGVs. SIGNIFICANCE: We analyzed real-world data from over 23,000 patients in Japan, revealing 4.1% harbored PGVs, particularly in BRCA1/2 and TP53, in CSGs. It highlights the prevalence of PGVs in Asian populations and supports the broader adoption of tumor-normal sequencing CGP tests for PGV evaluation.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinNeoplasmsBRCA2 ProteinGerm CellsHumansTumor Suppressor Protein p53United StatesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID37916805
PMCPMC10644847
OpenAlexW4388233022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.