Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37916681›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2023

Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 2.

Alice Beattie, Catrin Treharne, Silvy Mardiguian, Sreeram V Ramagopalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice BeattieLane Clark & Peacock, London, W1U 1DQ, UK.
Catrin TreharneLane Clark & Peacock, London, W1U 1DQ, UK.
Silvy MardiguianBeiGene, London, EC4A 4AB, UK.
Sreeram V RamagopalanLane Clark & Peacock, London, W1U 1DQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this latest update, we explore the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) enacted by the US Congress in August 2022, with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently releasing the list of the first ten drugs it will negotiate prices on. We also cover the consequences of price controls and rigid value assessment in Germany which have led to the withdrawal of a number of medicines. It will be important to see how the IRA balances cost-saving with holistic value assessment, incentives for innovation and patient access to treatment.

Indexed as

Economic CompetitionMedicareAgedDrug CostsGermanyHumansUnited Statesdrug pricinginflation reduction actmarket accessmedicareregulatoryvalue assessment

Identifiers

PMID37916681
PMCPMC10734314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.