ReviewCureus2023
Anatomical Variations in the Pectoralis Minor Muscle Origin and Insertion: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06554860 (Scapular Blackburn Stabilization Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Scapular Blackburn Stabilization Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prospective Analysis of Scapular Positioning Patterns and Shoulder and Elbow Injury Susceptibility in Professional Baseball Pitchers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comment: A tale of the lost rib - Revisiting anatomy and volume optimisation.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Use of the pectoralis minor and coracoacromial ligament for a biplanar coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction: A cadaveric feasibility study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathology of the shoulder is among the most widespread medical presentations and may be a result of existing anatomical variations. Therefore, the knowledge of the variations is vital for physicians and clinicians, tasked with treating patients presenting similar complaints to minimize misdiagnosis and prevent iatrogenic injuries. Therefore, the main objective of the present systematic review the variations in pectoralis minor muscle origin and insertion/attachment point. The study also seeks to better inform physicians and clinicians of the task of treating patients with various pathology problems and to ascertain that, upon identification, the pectoralis minor muscle variants are aptly appreciated. The search method used in this systematic review entails the use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, and the searching of several online databases, for studies focusing on variations in pectoralis minor muscles. The author reviewer evaluated the studies for eligibility, and the selection criteria for the studies used are described below. This systematic review has disclosed that, in some individuals, the pectoralis minor muscles have their origins in the second, third, and fourth ribs, even as others have their origin in the third and fourth ribs. Still, the systematic review has disclosed that, in certain individuals, the insertion of the pectoralis minor muscle occurs at the supraspinatus tendon, even as there are anomalies in the pectoralis minor insertion points linked to subacromial impingement, possible compression of the brachial plexus anteromedial and the axillary artery, and the subcoracoid impingement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.