Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37916143›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

The impact of circular stapler size on the risk of anastomotic stricture following total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Behnam Behboudi, Seyed-Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti, Seyyed-Alireza Hosseini, Kiana Tadbir-Vajargah, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Alireza Hadizadeh, Amirhossein Poopak, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Alireza Kazemeini, Aryan Ayati and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Behnam BehboudiColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Seyed-Mohsen Ahmadi-TaftiColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-8353
Seyyed-Alireza HosseiniColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Kiana Tadbir-VajargahColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mohammad Sadegh FazeliColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Alireza HadizadehColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-7557
Amirhossein PoopakColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mohammad Reza KeramatiColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Alireza KazemeiniColorectal Research Center Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Aryan AyatiResearch Center for Advanced Technologies in Cardiovascular Medicine Cardiovascular Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-6865
Hannaneh Yousefi-KomaResearch Center for Advanced Technologies in Cardiovascular Medicine Cardiovascular Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Imam Khomeini Hospital · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery complications are a major issue affecting morbidity and mortality rates. Anastomotic stricture, which occurs in almost 30% of patients after surgery for rectal cancer, is one of the most serious but underreported side effects. In this study, we tried to assess the effect of stapler size on anastomotic stricture rate. Materials and Methods: At our facility, all patients underwent low anterior resections (LAR) performed using an open laparotomy technique. A contour-curved stapler and an end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) circular stapler were used in the double stapling technique (DST). All patients also underwent a protective loop ileostomy. Patients who developed stricture following leakage were excluded. Results: This study comprised a total of 173 rectal cancer patients. A 29-mm circle stapler was used to anastomose 77 patients (44.5%), while a 31-mm circular stapler was used to anastomose 96 patients (55.5%). Six individuals experienced strictures; two had a 29 mm stamper and four (4.4%) had a 31 mm one. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p:0.575). On aggregate, 8 patients experienced leakage; 3 (3.8%) of these patients received treatment with a 29 mm stapler, whereas 5 (5.2%) received treatment with a 31 mm stapler. Conclusion: this study found no statistically significant difference in the stricture rates and stapler size. The findings of this study provide credibility to the notion that in rectal cancer patients having LAR, strictures can be safely avoided by performing the anastomoses with both staplers.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageanastomotic stricturecolorectal cancerlow anterior resection

Identifiers

PMID37916143
PMCPMC10617984
OpenAlexW4387964843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.