Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37916016›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2023

Study of Post-hysterectomy Vault Prolapse and Surgical Management.

Hemangi J Kansaria, Tulika Chouhan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hemangi J KansariaSeth G. S. Medical College and K. E. M. Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Tulika ChouhanDepartment of OBGY, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
College of Medicine & JNM Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of study: To study the epidemiology and various methods of repair of vaginal vault prolapse in selected group of patients and the benefits of various modes of treatment in the management of vault prolapse. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with grade lll or lV vault prolapse were enrolled in our study. Sacrospinous fixation was performed in 37 patients. High risk factors for prolapse, surgical results and complications were evaluated. Results: In the current study, maximum cases of vault prolapse, 67.6%, were in the age group of 51-60 years. Out of 37 patients, 18.9% had a history of chronic cough secondary to bronchial asthma or past history of tuberculosis And 13.5% had a bowel dysfunction (chronic constipation). Vaginal vault prolapse most commonly was seen following vaginal hysterectomy (43.3%) as compared to total abdominal hysterectomy (29.7%). Most common surgery was performed for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse being sacrospinous fixation in the current study. In total, 29.7% of the patients had early post-operative complications like urinary tract infection (16.2%), urinary retention (5.4%) and buttock pain (5.4%), and 2.7% had vaginal cuff cellulitis. Dyspareunia is a common complication post-operatively following sacrospinous fixation, due to shortening of vaginal length post-procedure. Conclusion: Only 29.7% patients had complications, among which most common complication was urinary tract infection, which was treated with injectable antibiotics, urinary retention and buttock pain being the less common complication. Dyspareunia was present only in 18.9% cases post-operatively due to vaginal shortening associated with the procedure. Sacrospinous fixation is a safe and effective procedure. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-023-01757-9.

Indexed as

Sacrospinous fixationVaginal hysterectomyVault prolapse

Identifiers

PMID37916016
PMCPMC10616018
OpenAlexW4376619049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.