Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915981›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023

Statement on how to interpret the QPS qualification on 'acquired antimicrobial resistance genes'.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover-Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Alessandra De Cesare, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist and 17 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of the feed additive consisting of l-threonine produced withEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of l-leucine produced withEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of l-valine produced withEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of l-arginine produced withEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Konstantinos Koutsoumanis
Ana Allende
Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez
Declan Bolton
Sara Bover-Cid
Marianne Chemaly
Alessandra De Cesare
Friederike Hilbert
Roland Lindqvist
Maarten Nauta
Romolo Nonno
Luisa Peixe
Giuseppe Ru
Marion Simmons
Panagiotis Skandamis
Elisabetta Suffredini
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Juan Evaristo Suarez
Estefania Noriega Fernández
Frédérique Istace
Jaime Aguillera
Rosella Brozzi
Ernesto Liébana
Beatriz Guerra
Sandra Correia
Lieve Herman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of microorganisms intended for use in the food or feed chains. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by 'qualifications' which should be assessed at strain and/or product level by EFSA's Scientific Panels. The generic qualification 'the strains should not harbour any acquired antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes to clinically relevant antimicrobials' applies to all QPS bacterial TUs. The different EFSA risk assessment areas use the same approach to assess the qualification related to AMR genes. In this statement, the terms 'intrinsic' and 'acquired' AMR genes were defined for the purpose of EFSA's risk assessments, and they apply to bacteria used in the food and feed chains. A bioinformatic approach is proposed for demonstrating the 'intrinsic'/'acquired' nature of an AMR gene. All AMR genes that confer resistance towards 'critically important', 'highly important' and 'important' antimicrobials, as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO), found as hits, need to be considered as hazards (for humans, animals and environment) and need further assessment. Genes identified as responsible for 'intrinsic' resistance could be considered as being of no concern in the frame of the EFSA risk assessment. 'Acquired' AMR genes resulting in a resistant phenotype should be considered as a concern. If the presence of the 'acquired' AMR gene is not leading to phenotypic resistance, further case-by-case assessment is necessary.

Indexed as

acquired resistanceAMRintrinsic resistancequalificationqualified presumption of safetyrisk assessmentwhole genome sequence

Identifiers

PMID37915981
PMCPMC10616732
OpenAlexW4388049670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.