Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915750›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2023

Carbon Nanomaterial-Based Hydrogels as Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.

Thiago Domingues Stocco, Tianyi Zhang, Edgar Dimitrov, Anupama Ghosh, Alessandro Marcio Hakme da Silva, Wanessa C M A Melo, Willian Gonçalves Tsumura, André Diniz Rosa Silva, Gustavo F Sousa, Bartolomeu C Viana and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Research progress of electroactivity graphene-based materials in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thiago Domingues StoccoBioengineering Program, Scientific and Technological Institute, Brazil University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-0251
Tianyi ZhangPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Edgar DimitrovPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Anupama GhoshDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering (DEQM), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alessandro Marcio Hakme da SilvaBioengineering Program, Scientific and Technological Institute, Brazil University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7320-4790
Wanessa C M A MeloFTMC, State Research institute Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Department of Functional Materials and Electronics, Vilnius, Lithuanian.
Willian Gonçalves TsumuraBioengineering Program, Scientific and Technological Institute, Brazil University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-843X
André Diniz Rosa SilvaFATEC, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9455-7488
Gustavo F SousaInterdisciplinary Laboratory for Advanced Materials (LIMAV), BioMatLab Group, Materials Science and Engineering Graduate Program, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8709-844X
Bartolomeu C VianaInterdisciplinary Laboratory for Advanced Materials (LIMAV), BioMatLab Group, Materials Science and Engineering Graduate Program, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5207-4269
Mauricio TerronesPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Anderson Oliveira LoboInterdisciplinary Laboratory for Advanced Materials (LIMAV), BioMatLab Group, Materials Science and Engineering Graduate Program, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2544-0438
Universidade Federal do Piauí · BRPennsylvania State University · USCenter for Physical Sciences and Technology · LTPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon-based nanomaterials (CBNs) are a category of nanomaterials with various systems based on combinations of sp2 and sp3 hybridized carbon bonds, morphologies, and functional groups. CBNs can exhibit distinguished properties such as high mechanical strength, chemical stability, high electrical conductivity, and biocompatibility. These desirable physicochemical properties have triggered their uses in many fields, including biomedical applications. In this review, we specifically focus on applying CBNs as scaffolds in tissue engineering, a therapeutic approach whereby CBNs can act for the regeneration or replacement of damaged tissue. Here, an overview of the structures and properties of different CBNs will first be provided. We will then discuss state-of-the-art advancements of CBNs and hydrogels as scaffolds for regenerating various types of human tissues. Finally, a perspective of future potentials and challenges in this field will be presented. Since this is a very rapidly growing field, we expect that this review will promote interdisciplinary efforts in developing effective tissue regeneration scaffolds for clinical applications.

Indexed as

NanostructuresTissue EngineeringCarbonHumansHydrogelsTissue ScaffoldsCarbonHydrogelsbiomaterialcarbonnanotechnologyscaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37915750
PMCPMC10616695
OpenAlexW4388190888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.