ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Bladder stone formation due to neglected double J stent: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pearl in a seashell: epitaxy of solitary cystolith on the leftover curl of a double j stent - a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Neglected double-J stent presenting as giant bladder and ureteral stone: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- A Forgotten Double-J Ureteric Stent as the Core of a Bladder Stone: A Case Report and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Double J (DJ) stents are commonly used in genitourinary procedures, but they can lead to complications including infection, hematuria, encrustation, and stone formation. The longer the duration of encrustation, the greater the risk of complications and renal dysfunction. Forgotten stents pose challenges for patients and can require endourological or open surgical procedures. Case presentation: A 40-year-old man with hypertension and coronary artery disease had a forgotten DJ stent for 3 years, causing suprapubic pain and dysuria. Kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) revealed a coiled DJ stent with a large bladder stone and encrustation, and an open cystolithotomy was successfully performed. Recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged without complication. Clinical discussion: Ureteral stents, including the DJ stent, are commonly used for urological conditions but can cause complications if retained beyond the intended timeframe. Optimal timing for stent removal is crucial, and patients' healthcare knowledge and adherence are critical to preventing retention. KUB X-ray can evaluate stent encrustation and bladder stones. Cystoscopy is the typical approach for stent removal, but supplementary interventions may be necessary. Open surgery was recommended for removing a large bladder stone and encrusted stent in this case. Conclusion: Timely removal of DJ stents is crucial to avoid complications. Extended retention can cause problems such as encrustation and stone formation. Patient education and adherence are essential to prevent retention and forgetfulness. This case report highlights the importance of careful management of patients with DJ stents for optimal outcomes and prevention of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.