Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915696›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023

Gossypiboma left behind in a cesarean section ended up with a failed laparotomic excision, which demanded another laparotomy to remove it: a rare case report.

Lava Abdullah, Sihaam Saleh Alsulaiman, Muhammad Imran, Rafe Barakat, Osama Rustum

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lava AbdullahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Sihaam Saleh AlsulaimanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Muhammad ImranUniversity College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Rafe BarakatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Osama RustumDepartment of General Surgery, Police Hospital, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Damascus Hospital · SYUniversity of Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Retained surgical items are an uncommon complication for surgical operations, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 5500 to 1 in 18 000 operations. Retained surgical sponges are the most common retained surgical items, accounting for nearly 70%. In 1884, Wilson reported the first retained foreign body after laparotomy. Case presentation: A 22-year-old woman was referred to our hospital complaining of a feeling of abdominal bloating and heaviness associated with pain, fever, fatigue, and severe stink vaginal discharges. Past surgical history included a cesarean section followed by laparotomy to remove a foreign body left behind; the obstetrician denied the presence of any foreign body. The diagnosis of retained surgical sponges was done in our hospital, according to the clinical history and radiographic study. The second laparotomy was performed, and the surgical sponge was removed. Clinical discussion: Retained surgical items' symptoms vary according to the site and types of materials. The diagnosis may be difficult because it resembles benign or malignant soft-tissue tumors of the abdomen and pelvis. Ultrasound and computed tomography have been used for the diagnosis of retained surgical items. The minimally invasive surgical approach appears to be most successful if the object is located early in the postoperative course. Conclusion: Retained surgical items are serious problems of surgical operations and should be among the differential diagnosis of any abdominal pain in patients with a history of prior surgery.

Indexed as

abdominal painforeign bodygossypibomavaginal discharges

Identifiers

PMID37915696
PMCPMC10617830
OpenAlexW4386691207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.