ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
An enormous benign primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: a case report and literature review of a seldom seen abdominal pathology.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: laparoscopic management and comprehensive literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Literature review and robotic management of a rare case of primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Retroperitoneal neoplasia comprise less than 2% of all tumours. benign primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma (PRMC) is an extremely rare tumour. Their clinical course is overall silent unless the patient presents with a vague abdominal or pelvic pain, abdominal distention, or a palpable mass. Their aetiology remains theorized and since 1989, only 46 cases (excluding ours) worldwide were documented in the literature. The majority of cases were discovered in females but the overall tumour incidence rate is still undetermined due to its rarity. Well-timed recognition of this pathology permits the necessary curative surgical intervention to take place. Case presentation: We hereby illustrate the rare case of a 23-year-old female who presented to the surgical clinic complaining solely of an unexplained gradual increase of the abdominal contour. Their presurgical radiological analysis yielded an intraabdominal large-sized well-demarcated retroperitoneal mass. Clinical discussion: Thorough resection of the mass was accomplished via open surgery. The subsequent microscopic analysis of excised tumour yielded the diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma of benign nature. Conclusion: Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma is a seldom seen tumour. The scarcity of its occurrence is further highlighted by the published data. Based on their conclusive review of the available published English-based literature, ours is the 47
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.