ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023
Effectiveness of knee pad as an additional device for wheelchairs in improving upper-limb dexterity during seated tasks: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of chair seat forward tilt angle on upper limb dexterity improvement in seated tasks: a pilot study.Journal of physical therapy science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to examine how supporting the knee from the front with a knee pad affected upper-limb dexterity while sitting. [Participants and Methods] A total of 14 healthy adult males were included in the study. As a measure of upper-limb dexterity, the number of pins was counted when the Purdue pegboard test was performed for 60 seconds. In addition, the ease of task performance was assessed using the visual analogue scale. There were two experimental conditions, with and without knee pad. The paired t-test was used to detect differences between the two conditions. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. [Results] The Purdue pegboard test was 29.4 ± 2.5 and 27.9 ± 3.6 pins with and without knee pad, respectively. The VAS was 76.1 ± 10.3 and 62.9 ± 14.1 with and without knee pad, respectively. Both measured values were significantly higher with knee pad than without. [Conclusion] Supporting the knees from the front with knee pad improves upper-limb functionality while sitting, making it easier to perform seated tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.