Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915433›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Rapid imaging in the field followed by photogrammetry digitally captures the otherwise lost dimensions of plant specimens.

Nicole James, Alex Adkinson, Austin Mast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole JamesDepartment of Art Florida State University 540 West Call Street Tallahassee 32301 Florida USA.
Alex AdkinsonDepartment of Art Florida State University 540 West Call Street Tallahassee 32301 Florida USA.
Austin MastInstitute for Digital Information and Scientific Communication (iDigInfo) Florida State University 142 Collegiate Loop Tallahassee 32306 Florida USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4995-0467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: We recognized the need for a customized imaging protocol for plant specimens at the time of collection for the purpose of three-dimensional (3D) modeling, as well as the lack of a broadly applicable photogrammetry protocol that encompasses the heterogeneity of plant specimen geometries and the challenges introduced by processes such as wilting. Methods and Results: We developed an equipment list and set of detailed protocols describing how to capture images of plant specimens in the field prior to their deformation (e.g., with pressing) and how to produce a 3D model from the image sets in Agisoft Metashape Professional. Conclusions: The equipment list and protocols represent a foundation on which additional improvements can be made for specimen geometries outside of the range of the six types considered, and an easy entry into photogrammetry for those who have not previously used it.

Indexed as

Agisoft Metashapebiodiversity specimen collectionfield workherbariumphotogrammetryphotographystructure from motion (SfM)three‐dimensional models

Identifiers

PMID37915433
PMCPMC10617317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.