ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023
Comparison of minimal detectable protoporphyrin IX concentrations with a loupe device and conventional 5-ALA fluorescence microscopy: an experimental study.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluorescence-guided resection of intradural spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- Detection of a Water-Soluble Hypericin Formulation in Glioblastoma Tissue with Fluorescence Lifetime and Intensity Using a Dual-Tap CMOS Camera System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: The 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence technique is now widely applied for intraoperative visualization of specific central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Previous technical implementations of this technique have relied on specifically modified surgical microscopes to visualize intratumoral fluorescent protoporphyrin (PpIX). While this approach evidently allows for reliable intraoperative tumor visualization, it requires the availability of specifically modified surgical microscopes and their use even in cases where the operating neurosurgeon would prefer to use surgical loupes. Recently, a novel loupe device was introduced that is also capable of visualizing 5-ALA fluorescence. Aim: The aim of this study was therefore to compare the detected PpIX concentrations between the conventional fluorescence microscope and the novel loupe device. Approach: We used fluorescence phantoms of different PpIX concentrations for comparison between a conventional fluorescence microscope and the novel loupe device. For this purpose, we created fluorescence images using the excitation light sources of the conventional fluorescence microscope and the loupe device with both available background illumination modes (low and high). Subsequently, the minimal detectable PpIX concentrations according to each technique were determined by five independent neurosurgeons. Results: Using the conventional fluorescence microscope, the median minimal detectable PpIX concentration was Conclusions: Our data indicate that the novel loupe device is able to visualize 5-ALA fluorescence with high sensitivity and thus might serve as a powerful tool for visualization of specific CNS tumors in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.