ArticleMolecular syndromology2023
Novel
Article in Molecular syndromology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nowadays, whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis is an essential part in the diagnostic pathway of individuals with complex phenotypes when routine exams, such as array-CGH and gene panels, have proved inconclusive. However, data on the diagnostic rate of WES analysis in adult individuals, negative to first-tier tests, are lacking. This is because initiatives with the aim of diagnosing rare diseases focus mainly on pediatric unsolved cases. Case Presentation: We hereby present a 45-year-old woman with severe intellectual disability, previous psychomotor developmental delay, behavioral disorders, stereotypies, nonconvulsive epilepsy, and dysmorphisms. The proband first came to our attention when she was 4 years old (in 1982); since then, she has undergone several clinical and instrumental assessments, without reaching a genetic diagnosis. At last, through WES analysis, a novel de novo variant in Conclusion: The variant is predicted to be deleterious and is most probably the cause of the proband's phenotype. The perseverance of the clinicians and the family allowed us to reach a diagnosis in a woman with a more than 30-year history of clinical evaluations, instrumental assessments, and genetic tests. This diagnosis was of significant relevance in genetic counseling for family members and the proband herself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.