Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915208›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

RoBERTa-Assisted Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreductive Surgery Using Operative Notes.

Alexandros Laios, Evangelos Kalampokis, Marios Evangelos Mamalis, Constantine Tarabanis, David Nugent, Amudha Thangavelu, Georgios Theophilou, Diederick De Jong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandros LaiosDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, ESGO Center of Excellence for Ovarian Cancer Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-7393
Evangelos KalampokisInformation Systems Lab, Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Marios Evangelos MamalisInformation Systems Lab, Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0009-0000-2680-0442
Constantine TarabanisDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
David NugentDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, ESGO Center of Excellence for Ovarian Cancer Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Amudha ThangaveluDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, ESGO Center of Excellence for Ovarian Cancer Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Georgios TheophilouDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, ESGO Center of Excellence for Ovarian Cancer Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Diederick De JongDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, ESGO Center of Excellence for Ovarian Cancer Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-674X
St James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Macedonia · GRNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContemporary efforts to predict surgical outcomes focus on the associations between traditional discrete surgical risk factors. We aimed to determine whether natural language processing (NLP) of unstructured operative notes improves the prediction of residual disease in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following cytoreductive surgery.

methodsElectronic Health Records were queried to identify women with advanced EOC including their operative notes. The Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) score was used to quantify the discrimination capacity of sequences of words (n-grams) regarding the existence of residual disease. We employed the state-of-the-art RoBERTa-based classifier to process unstructured surgical notes. Discrimination was measured using standard performance metrics. An XGBoost model was then trained on the same dataset using both discrete and engineered clinical features along with the probabilities outputted by the RoBERTa classifier.

resultsThe cohort consisted of 555 cases of EOC cytoreduction performed by eight surgeons between January 2014 and December 2019. Discrete word clouds weighted by n-gram TF-IDF score difference between R0 and non-R0 resection were identified. The words 'adherent' and 'miliary disease' best discriminated between the two groups. The RoBERTa model reached high evaluation metrics (AUROC .86; AUPRC .87, precision, recall, and F1 score of .77 and accuracy of .81). Equally, it outperformed models that used discrete clinical and engineered features and outplayed the performance of other state-of-the-art NLP tools. When the probabilities from the RoBERTa classifier were combined with commonly used predictors in the XGBoost model, a marginal improvement in the overall model's performance was observed (AUROC and AUPRC of .91, with all other metrics the same). CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: We applied a sui generis approach to extract information from the abundant textual surgical data and demonstrated how it can be effectively used for classification prediction, outperforming models relying on conventional structured data. State-of-art NLP applications in biomedical texts can improve modern EOC care.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMachine LearningNatural Language Processingcomplete cytoreductionepithelial ovarian cancerexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningnatural language processingoperative notesRoBERTatransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37915208
PMCPMC10624075
OpenAlexW4388236039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.