Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915142›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Large vessel occlusion prediction scale thresholds that are sensitive for DAWN Trial patients.

Kevin J Keenan, Wade S Smith, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Diogo C Haussen, Ronald F Budzik, Alain Bonafé, Parita Bhuva, Dileep R Yavagal, Marc Ribò, Christophe Cognard and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validation of the Ultimate Stroke Scale (USS): A standardized tool for automated large vessel occlusion screening.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 4 countries.

Kevin J KeenanDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5643-9878
Wade S SmithDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ashutosh P JadhavDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Diogo C HaussenDepartment of Neurology and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ronald F BudzikDepartment of Radiology, OhioHealth/Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Alain BonaféDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Hop Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Parita BhuvaTexas Stroke Institute at HCA North Texas, Plano, TX, USA.
Dileep R YavagalDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Marc RibòVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Christophe CognardDepartment of Neuroradiology, Hospital Purpan, Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4287-2627
Ricardo A HanelBaptist Medical Center Jacksonville/Lyerly Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ameer E HassanDepartment of Neurology, Valley Baptist Medical Center - Harlingen, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7148-7616
Cathy A SilaUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5109-8736
Tudor G JovinCooper Hospital University Medical Center, Camden, NJ, USA.
Raul G NogueiraDepartment of Neurology, UPMC Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USBaptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCooper University Hospital · USGrady Memorial Hospital · USHôpital Purpan · FROhioHealth · USTexas Back Institute · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ESValley Baptist Medical Center · US

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
Smith_U24_Supplement P0570485 5 30 2023U24NS107229 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Anthony Suyoung Kim · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NorCal - Coordinating Stroke CenterU10NS086494 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SMITH, WADE S · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086494NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundLarge vessel occlusion (LVO) prediction scales are used to triage prehospital suspected stroke patients with a high probability of LVO stroke to endovascular therapy centers. The sensitivities of these scales in the 6-to-24-h time window are unknown. Higher scale score thresholds are typically less sensitive and more specific. Knowing the highest scale score thresholds that remain sensitive could inform threshold selection for clinical use. Sensitivities may also vary between left and right-sided LVOs.MethodsLVO prediction scale scores were retrospectively calculated using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of patients enrolled in the DAWN Trial. All patients had last known well times between 6 and 24 h, NIHSS scores ≥ 10, intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions, and mismatches between their clinical severities and infarct core volumes. Scale thresholds with sensitivities ≥ 85% were identified, along with scores ≥ 5% more sensitive for left or right-sided LVOs. Specificities could not be calculated because all patients had LVOs.ResultsA total of 201 out of 206 patients had the required NIHSS subitem scores. CPSS = 3, C-STAT ≥ 2, FAST-ED ≥ 4, G-FAST ≥ 3, RACE ≥ 5, and SAVE ≥ 3 were the highest thresholds that were still 85% sensitive for DAWN Trial LVO stroke patients. RACE ≥ 5 was the only typically used score threshold more sensitive for right-sided LVOs, though similar small differences were seen for other scales at higher thresholds.ConclusionsOur findings likely represent the maximum sensitivities of the LVO prediction scales tested for ideal thrombectomy candidates in the 6-to-24-h time window because NIHSS scores were documented in hospitals during a clinical trial rather than in the prehospital setting. Patients with NIHSS scores < 10 or more distal LVOs would lower sensitivities further. Selecting even higher scale thresholds for LVO triage would lead to many missed LVO strokes.

Indexed as

StrokeAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexTriageneurological examinationStroketriage

Identifiers

PMID37915142
PMCPMC12602885
OpenAlexW4388228921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.