Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915089›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2023

Barriers and facilitators of implementing electronic monitors to improve adherence and health outcomes in tuberculosis patients: protocol for a systematic review based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Wenhui Li, Min Su, Weile Zhang, Xiaojing Fan, Renzhong Li, Yulong Gao, Xiaolin Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenhui LiSchool of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Min SuSchool of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China. sumin1227@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-1891
Weile ZhangSchool of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xiaojing FanSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Renzhong LiChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yulong GaoInner Mongolia Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, China.
Xiaolin WeiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Inner Mongolia University · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNInner Mongolia Comprehensive Disease Prevention and Control Center · CNUniversity of Toronto · CAXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72164031National Natural Science Foundation of China 72204128Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia 2020BS07002Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 72004178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) has been regarded as 'a relentless scourge', increasing morbidity and mortality and burdening vulnerable populations. Poor adherence to TB treatment and ineffective traditional interventions hinders TB control. A novel TB approach called 'electronic monitors', equipping medication boxes with daily audio or visual reminders for electronically monitoring medication intake, seems promising in improving adherence and health outcomes and overcoming the weaknesses of traditional interventions. However, no review has systematically examined and synthesized the influencing factors of implementing electronic monitors. Implementation research offers the means to analyse the influencing factors of the implementation and its process, fitting well with the aim of this review. Therefore, the widely recognized Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which offers a common taxonomy for evaluating intervention implementation, will be adopted to systematically identify barriers and facilitators of the electronic monitors for improving adherence and health outcomes in patients with TB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature research will be conducted in five electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) to identify the barriers and facilitators of implementing electronic monitors in patients with TB. The CFIR will be used as a guide for categorizing and synthesizing the barriers and facilitators. Study screening, data extraction, quality appraisal and data analysis will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The use of additional reviewers will solve any disagreements between the two reviewers. DISCUSSION: Given the increased prominence of TB epidemiology and the adherence problem of electronic monitors, there is a solid rationale for synthesizing the existing studies via the CFIR. The findings and conclusion of this review will lay bare the achievements and effectiveness of implementing electronic monitors, as well as the attendant gaps and limitations. Further strategies for facilitating the implementation of electronic monitors will also be explored. This review will be of essential significance for research and practice, supporting future academic research initiatives centred on patients with TB and aiding electronic monitor design in lowering the morbidity and mortality associated with TB disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO: CRD42023395747.

Indexed as

TuberculosisElectronicsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicBarriers and facilitatorsElectronic monitorsImplementation scienceTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID37915089
PMCPMC10621129
OpenAlexW4388127769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.