Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915053›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2023

Estimating the cost-effectiveness threshold of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China using mean opportunity cost and contingent valuation method.

Qian Peng, Yue Yin, Min Liang, Mingye Zhao, Taihang Shao, Yaqian Tang, Zhiqing Mei, Hao Li, Wenxi Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qian PengCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Yue YinCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Min LiangSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Mingye ZhaoCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Taihang ShaoCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Yaqian TangCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhiqing MeiCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Hao LiCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Wenxi TangDepartment of Public Administration, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China. tokammy@cpu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72174207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMonetizing health has sparked controversy and has implications for pricing strategies of emerging health technologies. Medical insurance payers typically set up thresholds for quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gains based on health productivity and budget affordability, but they rarely consider patient willingness-to-pay (WTP). Our study aims to compare Chinese payer threshold and patient WTP toward QALY gain of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to inform a potential inclusion of patient WTP under more complex decision-making scenarios.

methodsA regression model was constructed with cost as the independent variable and QALY as the dependent variable, where the regression coefficients reflect mean opportunity cost, and by transforming these coefficients, the payer threshold can be obtained. Patient WTP was elicited through a contingent valuation method survey. The robustness of the findings was examined through sensitivity analyses of model parameters and patient heterogeneity.

resultsThe payer mean threshold in the base-case was estimated at 150,962 yuan (1.86 times per capita GDP, 95% CI 144,041-159,204). The two scenarios analysis generated by different utility inputs yielded thresholds of 112,324 yuan (1.39 times per capita GDP) and 111,824 yuan (1.38 times per capita GDP), respectively. The survey included 85 patients, with a mean WTP of 148,443 yuan (1.83 times per capita GDP, 95% CI 120,994-175,893) and median value was 106,667 yuan (1.32 times the GDP per capita). Due to the substantial degree of dispersion, the median was more representative. The payer threshold was found to have a high probability (98.5%) of falling within the range of 1-2 times per capita GDP, while the robustness of patient WTP was relatively weak.

conclusionsIn China, a country with a copayment system, payer threshold was higher than patient WTP, indicating that medical insurance holds significant decision-making authority, thus temporarily negating the need to consider patient WTP.

Indexed as

Advanced lung cancerChinaCost-effectiveness thresholdQALYValueWillingness-to-pay

Identifiers

PMID37915053
PMCPMC10621116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.