Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37915017›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Cefoxitin versus carbapenems as definitive treatment for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in intensive care unit: a propensity-matched retrospective analysis.

Tanguy Dequidt, Sylvaine Bastian, Mathieu Nacher, Sébastien Breurec, Michel Carles, Guillaume Thiery, Laurent Camous, Benoit Tressieres, Marc Valette, Jean-David Pommier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Epidemiology and In-Depth Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tanguy DequidtInfectious Diseases Department, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France. tanguy.dequidt@gmail.com.
Sylvaine BastianLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Mathieu NacherClinical Investigation Center Antilles French Guiana (CIC INSERM 1424), Cayenne Hospital Center, French Guiana, France.
Sébastien BreurecLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Michel CarlesInfectious Diseases Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Guillaume ThieryMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
Laurent CamousIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Benoit TressieresCentre for Clinical Investigation 1424, INSERM, Pointe-à-Pitre/Les Abymes, France.
Marc ValetteIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Jean-David PommierIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pointe-à-Pitre · GPInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRInstitute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth · FRUniversity of French Guiana · GF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite cefoxitin's in vitro resistance to hydrolysis by extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), treatment of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) infections with cefoxitin remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical efficacy of cefoxitin as definitive antibiotic therapy for patients with ESBL-KP bacteremia in intensive care unit, versus carbapenem therapy.

methodsThis retrospective study included all patients with monomicrobial bacteremia hospitalized in intensive care unit between January 2013 and January 2023 at the University Hospital of Guadeloupe. The primary outcome was the 30-day clinical success defined as a composite endpoint: 30-day survival, absence of relapse and no change of antibiotic therapy. Cox regression including a propensity score (PS) and PS-based matched analysis were performed for endpoint analysis.

resultsA total of 110 patients with bloodstream infections were enrolled. Sixty-three patients (57%) received definitive antibiotic therapy with cefoxitin, while forty-seven (43%) were treated with carbapenems. 30-day clinical success was not significantly different between patients treated with cefoxitin (57%) and carbapenems (53%, p = 0.823). PS-adjusted and PS-matched analysis confirmed these findings. Change of definitive antibiotic therapy was more frequent in the cefoxitin group (17% vs. 0%, p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed for the other secondary endpoints. The acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was significantly higher in patients receiving carbapenem therapy (5% vs. 23%, p = 0.007).

conclusionsOur results suggest that cefoxitin as definitive antibiotic therapy could be a therapeutic option for some ESBL-KP bacteremia, sparing carbapenems and reducing the selection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCefoxitinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefoxitinBloodstream infectionsCarbapenemCefoxitinExtended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)Intensive care unitKlebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID37915017
PMCPMC10619259
OpenAlexW4388133057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.