ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
Evaluation of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive children and adolescents.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertension in Children: Narrative Review of Epidemiology, Outcome and Target Organ Damage.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hypertension and vascular health in the young.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Endothelial Dysfunction in Adolescent Hypertension: Diagnostic Challenges and Early Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtherosclerotic changes can be attributed to early endothelial damage in individuals with hypertension. We aimed to explore the relationship between endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in newly diagnosed children without end-organ damage, considering carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and functional capillaroscopy parameters. We also analyzed the differences between dipper and non-dipper patients.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 20 patients diagnosed with essential hypertension with no target organ damage, and 20 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled. The patient group comprised newly diagnosed individuals not receiving antihypertensive treatment. Hypertensive patients were divided into two groups (dipper and non-dipper patients). The measurements of CIMT, brachial FMD, and functional capillaroscopy were performed before starting treatment.
resultsAmong the patients, 11 were boys, and 9 were girls, with a median age of 16.0 (2.13) years. Of 20 hypertensive patients, 10 were dipper and 10 were non-dipper. Significant differences were observed between the hypertensive patients and controls in terms of CIMT (p = 0.04), brachial artery FMD (p = 0.02), and functional capillary density (p < 0.001). Hypertensive patients exhibited increased CIMT, reduced brachial artery FMD, and lower capillary density. However, there were no differences between dippers and non-dippers regarding age, sex, height SDS, weight SDS, CIMT SDS, brachial artery FMD, and capillary density.
conclusionsUnderstanding the vascular consequences associated with essential hypertension emphasizes the importance of early detection and management of hypertension. Herein, we have effectively highlighted significant endothelial changes through the analysis of three parameters in newly diagnosed children without apparent target organ damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37914964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.