ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2024
Population Based Time Trends in the Epidemiology and Mortality of Gastroesophageal Junction and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- MET Expression in Upper Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma: Prevalence, Prognostic Impact, and Implications for Anti-MET Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapy.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Prediction-model development and temporal validation for six-month cancer-specific mortality inJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Years of Life Lost of Patients With Early Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction Compared to Esophageal or Gastric Adenocarcinoma. A Registry-Based Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Proportional Frequency and Clinical Characteristics of Gastric, Esophageal, and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers in a Private Medical Group in Brazil.World journal of oncology · 2026Article
- Novel Methylation-Based Model for Accurate Diagnosis of Upper Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Claudin 18.2 in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: prevalence, biomarker associations, and implications for equity.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Sex disparity in survival outcomes of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Association of HER2 amplification or overexpression with overall survival in advanced upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic significance and risk factors of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in esophagogastric junction cancer: a single-center, retrospective study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Hexokinase 2 as an independent risk factor for worse patient survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma and as a potential therapeutic target protein: A retrospective, single‑center cohort study.Oncology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited data are available on the epidemiology of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC), particularly in comparison to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). With the advent of molecular non-endoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) detection tests which sample the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, early detection of EAC and GEJAC has become a possibility and their epidemiology has gained importance.
aimsWe sought to evaluate time trends in the epidemiology and survival of patients with EAC and GEJAC in a population-based cohort.
methodsEAC and GEJAC patients from 1976 to 2019 were identified using ICD 9 and 10 diagnostic codes from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Clinical data and survival status were abstracted. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR). Survival analysis and Cox proportional models were used to assess predictors of survival.
resultsWe included 443 patients (287 EAC,156 GEJAC). The incidence of EAC and GEJAC during 1976-2019 was 1.40 (CI 1.1-1.74) and 0.83 (CI 0.61-1.11) per 100,000 people, respectively. There was an increase in the incidence of EAC (IRR = 2.45, p = 0.011) and GEJAC (IRR = 3.17, p = 0.08) from 2000 to 2004 compared to 1995-1999, plateauing in later time periods. Most patients had associated BE and presented at advanced stages, leading to high 5-year mortality rates (66% in EAC and 59% in GEJAC). Age and stage at diagnosis were predictors of mortality.
conclusionThe rising incidence of EAC/GEJAC appears to have plateaued somewhat in the last decade. However, both cancers present at advanced stages with persistently poor survival, underscoring the need for early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.