Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914832›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Patient-reported outcome measures more than fifteen years after treatment of sagittal or metopic craniosynostosis: a prospective cohort study.

Peter A Woerdeman, Vita M Klieverik, Alexander Cheong, Ash Singhal, Douglas Cochrane, Paul Steinbok

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Long-term subjective patient's satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes in sagittal synostosis: a study of 488 patients operated by early, wide, open strip craniectomy.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-syndromic craniosynostosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter A WoerdemanDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.a.woerdeman@umcutrecht.nl.
Vita M KlieverikDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander CheongCenter for Disease Control, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ash SinghalDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Division of Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Douglas CochraneDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Division of Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Paul SteinbokDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Division of Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the long-term anthropometric measurements, cosmetic satisfaction, and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment or observation only of sagittal or metopic single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC).

methodsA prospective study was designed for all patients diagnosed with non-syndromic sagittal and metopic craniosynostosis at the British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, in the period July 1986 to July 2006. After a minimum of 15 years post-diagnosis, all eligible patients were invited to fill out the Craniofacial Surgery Outcomes Questionnaire (CSO-Q) and to attend a scheduled follow-up appointment for the collection of anthropometric measurements. A descriptive analysis of the cosmetic results was performed. Statistical analyses compared the differences in anthropometric measurements between treated and non-treated patients.

resultsOf the 253 eligible patients, 52 participants were willing to share patient data for use in the study. Of those 52 former patients, 36 (69.2%) filled out and returned the CSO-Q and 23 (44.2%) attended the follow-up appointment. The mean follow-up period between surgical treatment and the CSO-Q was 20.2 ± 2.5 years and between surgical treatment and the follow-up appointment was 20.9 ± 2.7 years. In patients with sagittal SSC, the mean cephalic index (CI) was significantly larger in treated than in non-treated patients (74.6 versus 69.1, p = 0.04), while the mean pupillary distance and forehead to back index were significantly smaller (pupillary distance 6.0 cm versus 6.7 cm [p = 0.04] and forehead to back index 19.6 cm versus 21.1 cm [p = 0.03]). Focusing more on the patient reported outcome measures, overall cosmetic satisfaction was found to be high (80.6%) and no differences were found between sagittal and metopic synostosis patients, nor between treated or non-treated craniosynostosis patients. Overall outcomes regarding self-esteem (RSES) and fear of negative evaluation (FNE) were comparable with population based outcomes.

conclusionThis is the first prospective study of sagittal and metopic craniosynostosis patients regarding long-term anthropometric outcome and patient reported outcome measures, including patients who were treated surgically and those who received observation only. Although study participation two decades after initial diagnosis was difficult to obtain, our data provide a platform from which one can develop an inclusive and uniform approach to assess patients' subjective cosmetic satisfaction using the CSO-Questionnaire and might be useful in preoperative counseling and psychosocial care for patients and their families.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesBritish ColumbiaChildHumansInfantProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCosmetic satisfactionCraniosynostosisLong-termPatient-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID37914832
PMCPMC10891201
OpenAlexW4388230592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.