Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A smartphone- and wearable-based biomarker for the estimation of unipolar depression severity.

Ahnjili Zhuparris, Ghobad Maleki, Liesbeth van Londen, Ingrid Koopmans, Vincent Aalten, Iris E Yocarini, Vasileios Exadaktylos, Albert van Hemert, Adam Cohen, Pim Gal and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ahnjili ZhuparrisCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands. azhuparris@chdr.nl.
Ghobad MalekiCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth van LondenTransparant Centre for Mental Health Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ingrid KoopmansCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincent AaltenCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Iris E YocariniLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vasileios ExadaktylosCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Albert van HemertLeiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Adam CohenCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pim GalCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert-Jan DollCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gabriël JacobsCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Zernikedreef 8, 2333CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wessel KraaijLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development for mood disorders can greatly benefit from the development of robust, reliable, and objective biomarkers. The incorporation of smartphones and wearable devices in clinical trials provide a unique opportunity to monitor behavior in a non-invasive manner. The objective of this study is to identify the correlations between remotely monitored self-reported assessments and objectively measured activities with depression severity assessments often applied in clinical trials. 30 unipolar depressed patients and 29 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled in this study. Each participant's daily physiological, physical, and social activity were monitored using a smartphone-based application (CHDR MORE™) for 3 weeks continuously. Self-reported depression anxiety stress scale-21 (DASS-21) and positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) were administered via smartphone weekly and daily respectively. The structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression scale and inventory of depressive symptomatology-clinical rated (SIGHD-IDSC) was administered in-clinic weekly. Nested cross-validated linear mixed-effects models were used to identify the correlation between the CHDR MORE™ features with the weekly in-clinic SIGHD-IDSC scores. The SIGHD-IDSC regression model demonstrated an explained variance (R

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMobile ApplicationsWearable Electronic DevicesDepressionHumansSelf ReportSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37914808
PMCPMC10620211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.