Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914801›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2023

Regorafenib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma: results of a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase II study.

Florence Duffaud, Jean-Yves Blay, Axel Le Cesne, Christine Chevreau, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, Elsa Kalbacher, Nicolas Penel, Christophe Perrin, Valérie Laurence, Emmanuelle Bompas and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of Ewing sarcoma (Spanish Sarcoma Research Group-GEIS).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults.Current oncology reports · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Florence DuffaudAPHM Hopital La Timone, Medical Oncology Unit, and Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Marseille, France. florence.duffaud@ap-hm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-3557
Jean-Yves BlayMedical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-120X
Axel Le CesneMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Christine ChevreauMedical Oncology Department, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Pascaline Boudou-RouquetteMedical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, APHP, Paris, France.
Elsa KalbacherMedical Oncology Department, CHU J Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Nicolas PenelMedical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret and Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5243-1548
Christophe PerrinMedical Oncology Unit, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Valérie LaurenceMedical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle BompasMedical Oncology Department, Centre René Gauduchau, Saint Herblain, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4414-7760
Esma Saada-BouzidMedical Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Corinne DelcambreMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
François BertucciMedical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0157-0959
Mathilde CancelMedical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Camille SchifflerDepartment of Statistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Laure MonardUnicancer, Paris, France.
Corinne BouvierAPHM Hopital La Timone, Pathology Department, and Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Vincent VidalAPHM Hopital La Timone, Radiology Department, and Aix-Marseille University Marseille, Marseille, France.
Nathalie GasparDepartment of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-8903
Sylvie ChabaudDepartment of Statistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRCentre Hospitalier René-Dubos · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRInstitut Curie · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRUniCancer Group · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe REGOBONE multi-cohort study explored the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced bone sarcomas; this report details the Ewing sarcoma (ES) cohort.

methodsPatients with relapsed ES progressing despite prior standard therapy, were randomised (2:1) to receive regorafenib or placebo. Patients on placebo could crossover to receive regorafenib after centrally confirmed progression. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 8 weeks. With one-sided α of 0.05, and 80% power, at least 14/24 progression-free patients at 8 weeks were needed for success.

resultsFrom September 2014 to November 2019, 41 patients were accrued. 36 patients were evaluable for efficacy: 23 on regorafenib and 13 on placebo. Thirteen patients (56%; one-sided 95% CI [37.5%-[)) were progression-free at 8 weeks on regorafenib vs. 1 (7.7%; 95% CI [0.4%-[) on placebo. Median PFS was 11.4 weeks on regorafenib, and 3.9 weeks on placebo. Ten placebo patients crossed over to receive regorafenib after progression. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related adverse events were pain (22%), asthenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (13%) and diarrhoea (13%).

conclusionAlthough the primary endpoint was not met statistically in this randomised cohort, there is evidence to suggest that regorafenib might modestly delay tumour progression in relapsed ES after failure of prior chemotherapy.

Indexed as

SarcomaSarcoma, EwingCohort StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHumansPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesregorafenib

Identifiers

PMID37914801
PMCPMC10703915
OpenAlexW4388127279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.