Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Entropy in scalp EEG can be used as a preimplantation marker for VNS efficacy.

B Sklenarova, J Chladek, M Macek, M Brazdil, J Chrastina, T Jurkova, P Burilova, F Plesinger, E Zatloukalova, I Dolezalova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B SklenarovaBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, Member of ERN-Epicar, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
J ChladekBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, Member of ERN-Epicar, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
M MacekInstitute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
M BrazdilBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, Member of ERN-Epicar, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
J ChrastinaBrno Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
T JurkovaInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
P BurilovaDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
F PlesingerInstitute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
E ZatloukalovaBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, Member of ERN-Epicar, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
I DolezalovaBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, Member of ERN-Epicar, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic. Irena.dolezalova@fnusa.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a therapeutic option in drug-resistant epilepsy. VNS leads to ≥ 50% seizure reduction in 50 to 60% of patients, termed "responders". The remaining 40 to 50% of patients, "non-responders", exhibit seizure reduction < 50%. Our work aims to differentiate between these two patient groups in preimplantation EEG analysis by employing several Entropy methods. We identified 59 drug-resistant epilepsy patients treated with VNS. We established their response to VNS in terms of responders and non-responders. A preimplantation EEG with eyes open/closed, photic stimulation, and hyperventilation was found for each patient. The EEG was segmented into eight time intervals within four standard frequency bands. In all, 32 EEG segments were obtained. Seven Entropy methods were calculated for all segments. Subsequently, VNS responders and non-responders were compared using individual Entropy methods. VNS responders and non-responders differed significantly in all Entropy methods except Approximate Entropy. Spectral Entropy revealed the highest number of EEG segments differentiating between responders and non-responders. The most useful frequency band distinguishing responders and non-responders was the alpha frequency, and the most helpful time interval was hyperventilation and rest 4 (the end of EEG recording).

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationElectroencephalographyEntropyHumansHyperventilationScalpSeizuresTreatment OutcomeVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID37914788
PMCPMC10620210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.