Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Dual adversarial deconfounding autoencoder for joint batch-effects removal from multi-center and multi-scanner radiomics data.

Lara Cavinato, Michela Carlotta Massi, Martina Sollini, Margarita Kirienko, Francesca Ieva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT improves radiomics feature reliability.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Challenging the significance of SUV-based parameters in a large-scale retrospective study on lung lesions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lara Cavinato *MOX, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milan, 20133, Italy. lara.cavinato@polimi.it.
Michela Carlotta Massi *Health Data Science Centre, Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini, 1, Milan, 20157, Italy.
Martina SolliniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Italy.
Margarita KirienkoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Francesca IevaMOX, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Politecnico di Milano · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITHuman Technopole · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging represents the primary tool for investigating and monitoring several diseases, including cancer. The advances in quantitative image analysis have developed towards the extraction of biomarkers able to support clinical decisions. To produce robust results, multi-center studies are often set up. However, the imaging information must be denoised from confounding factors-known as batch-effect-like scanner-specific and center-specific influences. Moreover, in non-solid cancers, like lymphomas, effective biomarkers require an imaging-based representation of the disease that accounts for its multi-site spreading over the patient's body. In this work, we address the dual-factor deconfusion problem and we propose a deconfusion algorithm to harmonize the imaging information of patients affected by Hodgkin Lymphoma in a multi-center setting. We show that the proposed model successfully denoises data from domain-specific variability (p-value < 0.001) while it coherently preserves the spatial relationship between imaging descriptions of peer lesions (p-value = 0), which is a strong prognostic biomarker for tumor heterogeneity assessment. This harmonization step allows to significantly improve the performance in prognostic models with respect to state-of-the-art methods, enabling building exhaustive patient representations and delivering more accurate analyses (p-values < 0.001 in training, p-values < 0.05 in testing). This work lays the groundwork for performing large-scale and reproducible analyses on multi-center data that are urgently needed to convey the translation of imaging-based biomarkers into the clinical practice as effective prognostic tools. The code is available on GitHub at this https://github.com/LaraCavinato/Dual-ADAE .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHodgkin DiseaseBiomarkersHumansPeer GroupBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37914758
PMCPMC10620174
OpenAlexW4388126373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.