ArticleeNeuro2023
A Two-Stage Automatic System for Detection of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges from Scalp Electroencephalograms.
Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditional spatial classification of expert-confirmed interictal epileptiform discharge epochs: An EEG-ECG ablation and SHAP analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a multimodal automatic interictal epileptiform discharge detection model: a prospective multi-center study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this work was to develop a deep learning-based automatic system with reliable performance in detecting interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) from scalp electroencephalograms (EEGs). For the present study, 484 raw scalp EEG recordings were included, standardized, and split into 406 for training and 78 for testing. Two neurophysiologists individually annotated the recordings for training in channel-wise manner. Annotations were divided into segments, on which nine deep neural networks (DNNs) were trained for the multiclassification of IED, artifact, and background. The fitted IED detectors were then evaluated on 78 EEG recordings with IED events fully annotated by three experts independently (majority agreement). A two montage-based decision mechanism (TMDM) was designed to determine whether an IED event occurred at a single time instant. Area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), as well as false-positive rates, F1 scores, and kappa agreement scores for sensitivity = 0.8 were estimated. In multitype classification, five DNNs provided one-versus-rest AUPRC mean value >0.993 using fivefold cross-validation. In IED detection, the system that had integrated the temporal convolutional network (TCN)-based IED detector and the TMDM rule achieved an AUPRC of 0.811. The false positive was 0.194/min (11.64/h), and the F1 score was 0.745. The agreement score between the system and the experts was 0.905. The proposed framework provides a TCN-based IED detector and a novel two montage-based determining mechanism that combined to make an automatic IED detection system. The system would be useful in aiding clinic EEG interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.