Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914305›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Cohort profile: recruitment and retention in a prospective cohort of Canadian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nicola Cherry, Anil Adisesh, Igor Burstyn, Quentin Durand-Moreau, Jean-Michel Galarneau, France Labrèche, Shannon M Ruzycki, Tanis Zadunayski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Professional Pride During COVID-19 in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicola CherryDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada ncherry@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3147-1548
Anil AdiseshDivision of Occupational Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Igor BurstynDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7153-4478
Quentin Durand-MoreauDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jean-Michel GalarneauDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
France LabrècheIRSST, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Shannon M RuzyckiDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-2910
Tanis ZadunayskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CADrexel University · USInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR 173209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHealthcare workers were recruited early in 2020 to chart effects on their health as the COVID-19 pandemic evolved. The aim was to identify modifiable workplace risk factors for infection and mental ill health.

participantsParticipants were recruited from four Canadian provinces, physicians (medical doctors, MDs) in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec, registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and healthcare aides (HCAs) in Alberta and personal support workers (PSWs) in Ontario. Volunteers gave blood for serology testing before and after vaccination. Cases with COVID-19 were matched with up to four referents in a nested case-referent study. FINDINGS TO DATE: Overall, 4964/5130 (97%) of those recruited joined the longitudinal cohort: 1442 MDs, 3136 RNs, 71 LPNs, 235 PSWs, 80 HCAs. Overall, 3812 (77%) were from Alberta. Prepandemic risk factors for mental ill health and respiratory illness differed markedly by occupation. Participants completed questionnaires at recruitment, fall 2020, spring 2021, spring 2022. By 2022, 4837 remained in the cohort (127 had retired, moved away or died), for a response rate of 89% (4299/4837). 4567/4964 (92%) received at least one vaccine shot: 2752/4567 (60%) gave postvaccine blood samples. Ease of accessing blood collection sites was a strong determinant of participation. Among 533 cases and 1697 referents recruited to the nested case-referent study, risk of infection at work decreased with widespread vaccination. FUTURE PLANS: Serology results (concentration of IgG) together with demographic data will be entered into the publicly accessible database compiled by the Canadian Immunology Task Force. Linkage with provincial administrative health databases will permit case validation, investigation of longer-term sequelae of infection and comparison with community controls. Analysis of the existing dataset will concentrate on effects on IgG of medical condition, medications and stage of pregnancy, and the role of occupational exposures and supports on mental health during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19British ColumbiaHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin GPandemicsProspective StudiesImmunoglobulin GCOVID-19EPIDEMIOLOGYHealth & safetyOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINEPREVENTIVE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37914305
PMCPMC10626826
OpenAlexW4388126689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.