Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37914223›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN

Beyond verbal fluency in the verbal fluency task: semantic clustering as a predictor of remission in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Eugenie Choe, Minji Ha, Sunah Choi, Sunghyun Park, Moonyoung Jang, Minah Kim, Jun Soo Kwon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A single composite index of semantic behavior tracks symptoms of psychosis over time.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Eugenie ChoeFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon).
Minji HaFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon).
Sunah ChoiFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon).
Sunghyun ParkFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon).
Moonyoung JangFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon).
Minah KimFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon) verte82@snu.ac.kr.
Jun Soo KwonFrom the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe, Park, Jang, Kim, Kwon); the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Choe); the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Ha, Choi, Kwon); the Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, SNU-MRC, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Kwon).
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been conflicting reports on whether conventional verbal fluency measures can predict the prognosis of individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. We aimed to investigate whether verbal fluency task measures that represent semantic processing more directly than conventional measures could be more reliable predictors of later remission in CHR individuals.

methodsWe recruited CHR individuals and healthy controls to participate in a baseline verbal fluency assessment. We identified semantic clusters within the verbal fluency task responses based on cosine similarity between consecutive words, calculated from the word embedding model. Binomial logistic regression was performed to test whether average semantic cluster size and number of words produced could be predictors of remission in CHR individuals.

resultsOur study sample included 96 CHR individuals and 178 healthy controls. According to clinical assessment at the last follow-up, 23 CHR individuals were classified as remitters and 73 as nonremitters, including 29 individuals who converted to psychosis. The CHR remitters showed larger average and maximum semantic cluster sizes than CHR nonremitters and healthy controls. Average semantic cluster size, but not the number of words, was a significant predictor of later remission in CHR individuals. LIMITATIONS: Our sample included only native Korean speakers.

conclusionA verbal fluency task measure that more specifically represents semantic processing may be a better neurocognitive predictive marker for remission in CHR individuals than conventional verbal fluency measures. Our results provide an explanation for heterogeneous reports on whether verbal fluency can predict prognosis in CHR individuals and suggest that semantic processing is a putative cognitive predictor of their prognosis.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSemanticsCluster AnalysisHumansNeuropsychological TestsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37914223
PMCPMC10620004
OpenAlexW4388140478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.