Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910655›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Machine learning-based radiomics nomograms to predict number of fields in postoperative IMRT for breast cancer.

Yichen Mao, Wenyi Di, Dan Zong, Zhongde Mu, Xia He

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yichen MaoThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2351-6308
Wenyi DiThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Dan ZongThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Zhongde MuThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xia HeThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.

Funding

2018M6322632021K422C81801834China Postdoctoral Science FoundationJiangsu Postdoctoral Research Funding ProgramKey Program of Jiangsu Commission of Health K2019028National Natural Science Foundation of China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is now the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Radiotherapy is an important part of the treatment for breast cancer, while setting proper number of fields dramatically affects the benefits one can receive. Machine learning and radiomics have been widely investigated in the management of breast cancer. This study aims to provide models to predict the best number of fields based on machine learning and improve the prediction performance by adding clinical factors.

methodsTwo-hundred forty-two breast cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled for this study, all of whom received postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy. The patients were randomized into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics shape features were extracted for eight machine learning algorithms to predict the number of fields. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were implemented to screen clinical factors. A combined model of rad-score and clinical factors were finally constructed. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall, F1 measure and accuracy were used to evaluate the model.

resultsRandom Forest outperformed from eight machine learning algorithms while predicting the number of fields. Prediction performance of the radiomics model was better than the clinical model, while the predictive nomogram combining the rad-score and clinical factors performed the best.

conclusionsThe model combining rad-score and clinical factors performed the best. Nomograms constructed from the combined models can be of reliable references for medical dosimetrists.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedFemaleHumansMachine LearningNomogramsRadiomicsRetrospective Studiesbreast cancermachine learningnumber of fieldsradiomicsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37910655
PMCPMC10930011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.