Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910591›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Epidemiology of scrub typhus and other rickettsial infections (2018-22) in the hyper-endemic setting of Mizoram, North-East India.

Vanramliana, Lalfakzuala Pautu, Pachuau Lalmalsawma, Gabriel Rosangkima, Devojit Kumar Sarma, Hunropuia Chinzah, Yogesh Malvi, Naveen Kumar Kodali, Christiana Amarthaluri, Karuppusamy Balasubramani and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

VanramlianaDepartment of Life Sciences, Pachhunga University College, Mizoram University, Mizoram, India.
Lalfakzuala PautuDepartment of Life Sciences, Pachhunga University College, Mizoram University, Mizoram, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-5985
Pachuau LalmalsawmaIntegrated Disease Surveillance Programme, Health & Family Welfare Department, Mizoram, India.
Gabriel RosangkimaDepartment of Life Sciences, Pachhunga University College, Mizoram University, Mizoram, India.
Devojit Kumar SarmaICMR- National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Hunropuia ChinzahDepartment of Life Sciences, Pachhunga University College, Mizoram University, Mizoram, India.
Yogesh MalviIntegrated Disease Surveillance Programme, Health & Family Welfare Department, Mizoram, India.
Naveen Kumar KodaliDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christiana AmarthaluriDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Karuppusamy BalasubramaniDepartment of Geography, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Praveen Balabaskaran NinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mizoram University · INCentral University of Tamil Nadu · INCentral University of Kerala · INICMR National Institute for Research in Environmental Health

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past decade, scrub typhus cases have been reported across India, even in regions that had no previous history of the disease. In the North-East Indian state of Mizoram, scrub typhus cases were first recorded only in 2012. However, in the last five years, the state has seen a substantial increase in the scrub typhus and other rickettsial infections. As part of the public health response, the Mizoram Government has integrated screening and line listing of scrub typhus and other rickettsial infections across all its health settings, a first in India. Here we detail the epidemiology of scrub typhus and other rickettsial infections from 2018-2022, systematically recorded across the state of Mizoram. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe line-listed data positive for scrub typhus and other rickettsial infections identified by rapid immunochromatographic test and/or Weil-Felix test from 2018-22 was used for the analysis. During this period, 22,914 cases of rickettsial infections were recorded, out of which 19,651 were scrub typhus cases. Aizawl is the worst affected, with 10,580 cases (46.17%). The average incidence of rickettsial infections is 3.54 cases per 1000 persons-year, and the case fatality rate is 0.35. Only ∼2% of the reported scrub typhus cases had eschar. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicate patients with eschar (aOR = 2.5, p<0.05), occupational workers [farmers (aOR:3.9), businessmen (aOR:1.8), construction workers (aOR:17.9); p<0.05], and children (≤10 years) (aOR = 5.4, p<0.05) have higher odds of death due to rickettsial infections.

conclusionThe integration of systematic surveillance and recording of rickettsial diseases across Mizoram has shed important insights into their prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. This study underscores the importance of active surveillance of rickettsial infections across India, as the burden could be substantially higher, and is probably going undetected.

Indexed as

Orientia tsutsugamushiRickettsia InfectionsScrub TyphusHumansIncidenceIndia

Identifiers

PMID37910591
PMCPMC10642901
OpenAlexW4388125726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.