Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910549›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Understanding the value of curation: A survey of researcher perspectives of data curation services from six US institutions.

Wanda Marsolek, Sarah J Wright, Hoa Luong, Susan M Braxton, Jake Carlson, Sophia Lafferty-Hess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Embedding FAIR Data Practices in Shared Core Resource Facilities.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wanda MarsolekUniveristy of Minnesota Libraries, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1771-3969
Sarah J WrightCornell University Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1502-131X
Hoa LuongUniversity Library, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
Susan M BraxtonUniversity Library, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
Jake CarlsonUniversity at Buffalo Libraries, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Sophia Lafferty-HessDuke University Libraries, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-3279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data curation encompasses a range of actions undertaken to ensure that research data are fit for purpose and available for discovery and reuse, and can help to improve the likelihood that data is more FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). The Data Curation Network (DCN) has taken a collaborative approach to data curation, sharing curation expertise across a network of partner institutions and data repositories, and enabling those member institutions to provide expert curation for a wide variety of data types and discipline-specific datasets. This study sought to assess the satisfaction of researchers who had received data curation services, and to learn more about what curation actions were most valued by researchers. By surveying researchers who had deposited data into one of six academic generalist data repositories between 2019-2021, this study set out to collect feedback on the value of curation from the researchers themselves. A total of 568 researchers were surveyed; 42% (238) responded. Respondents were positive in their evaluation of the importance and value of curation, indicating that the participants not only value curation services, but are largely satisfied with the services provided. An overwhelming majority 97% of researchers agreed that data curation adds value to the data sharing process, 96% agreed it was worth the effort, and 90% felt more confident sharing their data due to the curation process. We share these results to provide insights into researchers' perceptions and experience of data curation, and to contribute evidence of the positive impact of curation on repository depositors. From the perspective of researchers we surveyed, curation is worth the effort, increases their comfort with data sharing, and makes data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.

Indexed as

Data CurationInformation DisseminationHumansProbabilityResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37910549
PMCPMC10619857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.