Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910489›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Evaluating the documentation of vital signs following implementation of a new comprehensive newborn monitoring chart in 19 hospitals in Kenya: A time series analysis.

Naomi Muinga, Timothy Tuti, Paul Mwaniki, Edith Gicheha, Chris Paton, Lenka Beňová, Mike English

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Naomi MuingaAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0749-0255
Timothy TutiAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-3004
Paul MwanikiAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0359-8426
Edith GichehaRice360 Global Health Institute, Rice University, Texas, United States of America.
Chris PatonNuffield Department of Medicine, Health systems Collaborative, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-9621
Lenka BeňováDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Sexual and Reproductive Health Group, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mike EnglishAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEKenya Medical Research Institute · KERice University · US

Funding

EPA EP-C-15-003Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-professional teams care for sick newborns, but nurses are the primary caregivers, making nursing care documentation essential for delivering high-quality care, fostering teamwork, and improving patient outcomes. We report on an evaluation of vital signs documentation following implementation of the comprehensive newborn monitoring chart using interrupted time series analysis and a review of filled charts. We collected post-admission vital signs (Temperature (T), Pulse (P), Respiratory Rate (R) and Oxygen Saturation (S)) documentation frequencies of 43,719 newborns with a length of stay > 48 hours from 19 public hospitals in Kenya between September 2019 and October 2021. The primary outcome was an ordinal categorical variable (no monitoring, monitoring 1 to 3 times, 4 to 7 times and 8 or more times) based on the number of complete sets of TPRS. Descriptive analyses explored documentation of at least one T, P, R and S. The percentage of patients in the no-monitoring category decreased from 68.5% to 43.5% in the post-intervention period for TPRS monitoring. The intervention increased the odds of being in a higher TPRS monitoring category by 4.8 times (p<0.001) and increased the odds of higher monitoring frequency for each vital sign, with S recording the highest odds. Sicker babies were likely to have vital signs documented in a higher monitoring category and being in the NEST360 program increased the odds of frequent vital signs documentation. However, by the end of the intervention period, nearly half of the newborns did not have a single full set of TPRS documented and there was heterogenous hospital performance. A review of 84 charts showed variable documentation, with only one chart being completed as designed. Vital signs documentation fell below standards despite increased documentation odds. More sustained interventions are required to realise the benefits of the chart and hospital-specific performance data may help customise interventions.

Identifiers

PMID37910489
PMCPMC10619831
OpenAlexW4388126256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.