Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910480›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2023

Immunogenicity and safety of heterologous boost immunization with PastoCovac Plus against COVID-19 in ChAdOx1-S or BBIBP-CorV primed individuals.

Sana Eybpoosh, Alireza Biglari, Rahim Sorouri, Fatemeh Ashrafian, Mona Sadat Larijani, Vicente Verez-Bencomo, Maria Eugenia Toledo-Romani, Carmen Valenzuela Silva, Mostafa Salehi-Vaziri, Sarah Dahmardeh and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sana EybpooshDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza BiglariSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rahim SorouriIPI Directorate, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh AshrafianClinical Research Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mona Sadat LarijaniClinical Research Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Vicente Verez-BencomoFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Maria Eugenia Toledo-RomaniPedro Kourí Tropical Medicine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Carmen Valenzuela SilvaCybernetics, Mathematics and Physics Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Mostafa Salehi-VaziriCOVID-19 National Reference Laboratory, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Sarah DahmardehVaccination Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Delaram DoroudQuality Control Department, Production and research Complex, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad BanifazlIranian Society for Support of Patients with Infectious Disease, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan MostafaviDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Anahita BavandClinical Research Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Amitis RamezaniClinical Research Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-8524
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRFinlay Institute · CUInstituto de Cibernética Matemática y Física · CUInstituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí” · CUIranian Center for Quantum Technologies · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed at evaluation and comparison of PastoCovac Plus protein-subunit vaccine in parallel with ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) and BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) in primarily vaccinated volunteers with two doses of ChAdOx1-S or BBIBP-CorV. MATERIALS AND

methods194 volunteers enrolled the study who were previously primed with 2 doses of ChAdOx1-S or BBIBP-CorV vaccines. They were divided into two heterologous regimens receiving a third dose of PastoCovac Plus, and two parallel homologous groups receiving the third dose of BBIBP-CorV or ChAdOx1-S. Serum samples were obtained just before and 4 weeks after booster dose. Anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies were quantified and the conventional live-virus neutralization titer, (cVNT50) assay was done against Omicron BA.5 variant. Moreover, the adverse events data were recorded after receiving booster doses.

resultsChAdOx1-S/PastoCovac Plus group reached 73.0 units increase in anti-Spike IgG rise compared to the ChAdOx1-S/ ChAdOx1-S (P: 0.016). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding neutralizing antibody rise (P: 0.256), indicating equivalency of both booster types. Adjusting for baseline titers, the BBIBP-CorV/PastoCovac Plus group showed 135.2 units increase (P<0.0001) in anti-Spike IgG, and 3.1 (P: 0.008) unit increase in mean rise of neutralizing antibodies compared to the homologous group. Adjustment for COVID-19 history, age, underlying diseases, and baseline antibody titers increased the odds of anti-Spike IgG fourfold rise both in the ChAdOx1-S (OR: 1.9; P: 0.199) and BBIBP CorV (OR: 37.3; P< 0.0001) heterologous groups compared to their corresponding homologous arms. The odds of neutralizing antibody fourfold rise, after adjustment for the same variables, was 2.4 (P: 0.610) for the ChAdOx1-S heterologous group and 5.4 (P: 0.286) for the BBIBP CorV heterologous groups compared to their corresponding homologous groups. All the booster types had the potency to neutralize BA.5 variant with no significant difference. The highest rate of adverse event incidence was recorded for ChAdOx1-S homologous group.

conclusionsPastoCovac Plus booster application in primed individuals with BBIBP-CorV or ChAdOx1-S successfully increased specific antibodies' levels without any serious adverse events. This vaccine could be administrated in the heterologous regimen to effectively boost humoral immune responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunizationImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBIBP COVID-19 vaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID37910480
PMCPMC10619776
OpenAlexW4388126274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.