ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2024
Clinical impact of the intensity of follow-up cystoscopy in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-urban disparities in high‑risk non-muscle‑invasive bladder cancer: lessons from the Canadian Bladder Cancer Information System.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- [Non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: time for a de-escalation of treatment and aftercare].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is significant lack on evidence regarding the effect of non-adherence to a recommended protocol in follow-up of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), or the impact of delaying detection of recurrent lesion. Here, we aimed to investigate the optimal frequency of follow-up cystoscopy of high-risk NMIBC with respect to oncological safety in the Japanese real-world clinical practice.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 206 patients with primary high-risk NMIBC. The intensity (%) of follow-up cystoscopy was calculated based on actual visits for cystoscopy and guideline-recommended frequency in the first 24-month follow-up period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses was used to reduce the risk of bias between groups. We performed a restricted cubic spline analysis with knots at intensity of follow-up cystoscopy ≤ 100% group to examine the possible association of progression risk with the intensity of follow-up as a continuous exposure.
resultsThe median intensity was 87.5% (interquartile range, 75-100). Adjusted multivariate analysis for MIBC-free and progression-free survival demonstrated no significant difference between adjusted ≤ 75% and > 75% intensity groups. A restricted cubic spline analysis suggested no significant effect of the intensity of follow-up on progression risk, and hazard ratios of patients of < 100% intensity were equivalent to those of patients of 100% intensity.
conclusionOur finding suggested decreased intensity of follow-up cystoscopy did not affect oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk NMIBC. Further prospective trials directly aimed at investigating optimized follow-up schedules for NMIBC are mandatory before substantial changes to existing clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37910382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.