Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910275›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023

Awake craniotomy during pregnancy: A systematic review of the published literature.

Mohammad Mofatteh, Mohammad Sadegh Mashayekhi, Saman Arfaie, Hongquan Wei, Arshia Kazerouni, Georgios P Skandalakis, Ahmad Pour-Rashidi, Abed Baiad, Lior Elkaim, Jack Lam and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Mohammad MofattehSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK. mmofatteh01@qub.ac.uk.
Mohammad Sadegh MashayekhiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Saman ArfaieDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hongquan WeiDepartment of 120 Emergency Command Center, Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong Province, China.
Arshia KazerouniMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Georgios P SkandalakisFirst Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelismos General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ahmad Pour-RashidiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Abed BaiadFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lior ElkaimMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jack LamDepartment of 120 Emergency Command Center, Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong Province, China.
Paolo PalmiscianoUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Xiumei SuObstetrical Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuxing LiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital, Foshan, China.
Sunit DasDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Keyoumars AshkanNeuro International Collaboration (NIC), London, UK.
Aaron A Cohen-GadolThe Neurosurgical Atlas, Carmel, IN, USA.
Foshan Second People's Hospital · CNCampbell Collaboration · NOEvangelismos Hospital · GRGuangzhou Medical University · CNInternational Business College - Indianapolis · USKing's College London · GBMcGill University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CATehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurosurgical pathologies in pregnancy pose significant complications for the patient and fetus, and physiological stressors during anesthesia and surgery may lead to maternal and fetal complications. Awake craniotomy (AC) can preserve neurological functions while reducing exposure to anesthetic medications. We reviewed the literature investigating AC during pregnancy. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from the inception to February 7th, 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Studies in English investigating AC in pregnant patients were included in the final analysis. Nine studies composed of nine pregnant patients and ten fetuses (one twin-gestating patient) were included. Glioma was the most common pathology reported in six (66.7%) patients. The frontal lobe was the most involved region (4 cases, 44.4%), followed by the frontoparietal region (2 cases, 22.2%). The awake-awake-awake approach was the most common protocol in seven (77.8%) studies. The shortest operation time was two hours, whereas the longest one was eight hours and 29 min. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 13.6 ± 6.5 (2-22) and 19.6 ± 6.9 (9-30) weeks at craniotomy. Seven (77.8%) studies employed intraoperative fetal heart rate monitoring. None of the AC procedures was converted to general anesthesia. Ten healthy babies were delivered from patients who underwent AC. In experienced hands, AC for resection of cranial lesions of eloquent areas in pregnant patients is safe and feasible and does not alter the pregnancy outcome.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaAnesthesia, GeneralCraniotomyFemaleHumansPregnancyWakefulnessAnesthesiaAwake craniotomyBrain mappingFetusPregnancyTumor

Identifiers

PMID37910275
PMCPMC10620271
OpenAlexW4388138317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.