ArticleJournal of ultrasound2024
The role of color doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis in ophthalmic patients.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal imaging in neuro-ophthalmology.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the case of ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) or retinal artery occlusion (RAO), distinguishing arteritic from non-arteritic can limit or prevent irreversible bilateral blindness. Here, the utility of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) in diagnosing giant cell arteritis (GCA) was evaluated.
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, a total of 38 cases diagnosed with ION or RAO were included, that presented to our department in the years 2018 up to 2021 and underwent both CDUS and temporal artery biopsy (TAB). The evaluation is based on TAB as reference standard.
resultsCDUS resulted in a sensitivity of 65.0% and a specificity of 100% (when excluding two inconclusive assessments). Therefore, when limiting TAB to only suspected cases with negative or unclear CDUS findings, the sensitivity and the specificity would remain unchanged at 100%, while reducing the need for TAB by 42.1%.
conclusionOverall, the data suggest the implementation of a stepwise diagnostic algorithm to confirm or rule out GCA, in which the CDUS plays a key role, thus omitting the requirement for TAB in many cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.