Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910229›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2024

Fruit dehiscence mechanism and release of dimorphic seeds with different germination properties in Commelina erecta.

Elisa Soledad Panigo, Eugenia Oggero, Ignacio Miguel Dellaferrera, Carlos Agustín Alesso, Guillermo Rubén Chantre, Mariel Gladis Perreta, Andrea Guadalupe Reutemann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa Soledad PanigoInstituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias del Litoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina. epanigo@fca.unl.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2117-167X
Eugenia OggeroInstituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias del Litoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4295-7923
Ignacio Miguel DellaferreraInstituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias del Litoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-3883
Carlos Agustín AlessoInstituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias del Litoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0657-0253
Guillermo Rubén ChantreDepartamento de Agronomía/CERZOS, Universidad Nacional del Sur/CONICET, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-0204
Mariel Gladis PerretaInstituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias del Litoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3844-0338
Andrea Guadalupe ReutemannFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina. andrea.reutemann@darwin.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-5432

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2018-03944Universidad Nacional del Litoral CAI+D2016-50020150100015LIUniversidad Nacional del Litoral CAI+D2020-50520190100078LI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commelina erecta is a successful weed species. The aims of this study were to analyse the morpho-anatomy of the fruit and dimorphic seeds of the weed C. erecta, the dynamics and type of dormancy, and water entry. Flowers and fruits at different development stages were processed using standard anatomical techniques. Besides, experiments of imbibition, germinability and water entry were performed on both seed types. In the fruit of C. erecta, free and coated seeds are developed within dehiscent and indehiscent carpels, respectively. Dehiscent carpels open through a region of mechanical weakness in the dorsal vascular bundle. This region does not form in the indehiscent carpel. The main anatomical differences between the two seed types were observed in the testa and in the number of covering layers. Imbibition experiments showed that the covering of both seed types is water permeable, so these seeds lack physical dormancy and may exhibit physiological dormancy. Germinability experiments showed that the dormancy in free seeds is variable throughout the reproductive season, whereas, in coated seeds, it is high throughout the reproductive season. The embryotega is an area where the hardness of the seed coat is interrupted and facilitates water entry. Differences in the morpho-anatomy of carpels result in the formation of dimorphic seeds with different covering layers and different germination properties. These different properties allow some seeds germinate immediately after falling from the mother plant, and others to be incorporated into the seed bank. These results are useful for designing weed management strategies in agroecosystems.

Indexed as

CommelinaFruitGerminationPlant DormancySeedsWaterWaterDimorphic seedsDormancyEmbryotegaReproductive anatomySexual reproduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.