ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Gram negative periprosthetic hip infection: nearly 25% same pathogen infection persistence at a mean of 2 years.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding resistance: a comprehensive study on pathogens and antibiotic efficacy in periprosthetic joint infections.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Vascular remodelling and fibrotic changes in the joint capsule during periprosthetic knee infections.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- The Role of PositivePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High and strikingly early failure-rate following gram-negative periprosthetic joint infection - a retrospective cohort study on 72 cases.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Cefepime/enmetazobactam for Gram-negative periprosthetic joint infections? A randomized porcine study on target tissue pharmacokinetics.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective multicentre European study of incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2026Article
- Comparison of synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin for the diagnosis of persistent periprosthetic joint infections at second stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Mid-term to long-term outcome and risk factors for failure of 158 hips with two-stage revision for periprosthetic hip joint infection.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2025Article
- Do Organism Profile and Resistance Patterns Change between First and Subsequent Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile gram negative (GN) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) have previously been described as difficult to treat pathogens with high rates of reinfection, limited investigations have addressed midterm outcomes and risk of infection persistence by the same pathogen. This study analyzed (1) baseline demographics, treatment strategy, and midterm outcomes of GN PJIs, as well as (2) differences in reinfection and relapse rates compared to gram positive (GP) PJIs.
methodsWe identified 29 patients that were revised for 30 GN PJIs of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) between 2010 and 2020 using a university-based hip registry. Mean age was 77 years, 63% were females (19), and mean BMI was 27 kg/m
results(1) The 5-year survivorship free of recurrent PJI was 69%, and there were 7 recurrent PJIs at a mean of 2 years. There were 2 further suprafascial wound infections, resulting in a 61% survivorship free of any infection at 5-years. At a mean of 2 years, there were 7 patients with reinfection by the same GN pathogen (6 PJIs, one wound infection) as at index revision (23%). (2) Following two-stage exchange, the 5-year survivorship free of recurrent PJI (GN: 74%; GP: 91%; p = 0.072), any infection (GN: 61%; GP: 91%; p = 0.001), and reinfection by the same pathogen was significantly lower among GN PJIs (GN: 73%; GP: 98%; p < 0.001).
conclusionsPatients revised for GN PJIs are at increased risk of reinfection as opposed to GP infections. Affected patients must be counseled on the exceptionally high risk of infection persistence with one in four developing relapses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.