Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910160›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2023

A tutorial on asymmetric electrocatalysis.

Jonas Rein, Samson B Zacate, Kaining Mao, Song Lin

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneous Indirect Redox Electrocatalysis in Electrolyte.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Parametrization of κACS catalysis · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonas ReinDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8237-6519
Samson B ZacateDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-3785
Kaining MaoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1184-7932
Song LinDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. songlin@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-6476

Funding

Electrochemistry as an enabling tool for reaction discoveryR01GM130928 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Song Lin · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemistry has emerged as a powerful means to enable redox transformations in modern chemical synthesis. This tutorial review delves into the unique advantages of electrochemistry in the context of asymmetric catalysis. While electrochemistry has historically been used as a green and mild alternative for established enantioselective transformations, in recent years asymmetric electrocatalysis has been increasingly employed in the discovery of novel asymmetric methodologies based on reaction mechanisms unique to electrochemistry. This tutorial review first provides a brief tutorial introduction to electrosynthesis, then explores case studies on homogenous small molecule asymmetric electrocatalysis. Each case study serves to highlight a key advance in the field, starting with the historic electrification of known asymmetric transformations and culminating with modern methods relying on unique electrochemical mechanistic sequences. Finally, we highlight case studies in the emerging reasearch areas at the interface of asymmetric electrocatalysis with biocatalysis and heterogeneous catalysis.

Identifiers

PMID37910160
PMCPMC10842033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.