Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37909639›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian dental journal

Effectiveness of low power laser in reducing postoperative signs and symptoms after third molar surgery: a triple-blind clinical trial.

Carlos Eduardo Nogueira Nunes, Katlyn Djéssi Silva Andrade, Carlos Aragão Martins, Filipe Nobre Chaves, Denise Hélen Imaculada Pereira de Oliveira, Marcelo Bonifácio da Silva Sampieri

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian dental journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos Eduardo Nogueira NunesDepartment of Stomatology- School of Odontology, UFC, Federal of University Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4223-4633
Katlyn Djéssi Silva AndradeDepartment of Stomatology- School of Odontology, UFC, Federal of University Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1479-0624
Carlos Aragão MartinsDepartment of Stomatology- School of Odontology, UFC, Federal of University Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5746-3629
Filipe Nobre ChavesDepartment of Stomatology- School of Odontology, UFC, Federal of University Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6345-8156
Denise Hélen Imaculada Pereira de OliveiraDepartment of Stomatology- School of Odontology, UFC, Federal of University Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6020-2374
Marcelo Bonifácio da Silva SampieriDepartment of Stomatology- School of Odontology, UFC, Federal of University Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7942-6642
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of using LPL (Low power laser) to reduce pain, edema, and trismus after impacted lower third molar extraction. A split-mouth randomized triple-blind clinical trial was conducted at the Federal University of Ceará. For inclusion criteria, it was necessary that the patient presented a clear indication for removal of both lower third molars, in addition to both molars being in similar positions. The third molars (38 and 48) were randomly allocated to the test group that received the LPL application protocol, and to the placebo group that received a simulation of the protocol, making a total sample of 44 surgeries. Patients in the test group used an average of 50% of the amount of analgesics that was used by the placebo group, however, there was a statistically significant difference only on days four and five. Regarding trismus, the test group presented wide mouth openings, both at 48 hours and at 7 days after surgery compared to the placebo group, but without a statistically significant difference. For edema, we noted an equilibrium between the test group and the placebo group, but no measurement obtained a statistically significant difference. The use of LPL presented better pain and trismus indicators after complex extractions. The use of LPL is thus indicated as a complementary therapy to reduce postoperative discomfort caused by complex tooth extractions.

Indexed as

Molar, ThirdTooth, ImpactedDouble-Blind MethodEdemaHumansLasersPostoperative PainTooth ExtractionTrismus

Identifiers

PMID37909639
PMCPMC10642278
OpenAlexW4387883186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.