Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37909227›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Active involvement of patients, radiation oncologists, and surgeons in a multidisciplinary team approach: Guiding local therapy in recurrent, metastatic rectal cancer.

Seo Hee Choi, Gowoon Yang, Woong Sub Koom, Seung Yoon Yang, Seung-Seob Kim, Joon Seok Lim, Han Sang Kim, Sang Joon Shin, Jee Suk Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seo Hee ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gowoon YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woong Sub KoomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Yoon YangDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Seob KimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joon Seok LimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Han Sang KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Joon ShinDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jee Suk ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7685-3382
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

he National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) NRF-2021R1A2C1010900the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI21C0974the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) NRF-2021R1F1A1055641the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) NRF-2022R1F1A1074344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the extensive implementation of an organized multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in cancer treatment, there is little evidence regarding the optimal format of MDT. We aimed to investigate the impact of patient participation in MDT care on the actual application rate of metastasis-directed local therapy.

methodsWe identified all 1211 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy at a single institution from 2006 to 2018. Practice patterns, tumor burden and OMD state were analyzed in recurrent, metastatic cases.

resultsWith a median follow-up of 60.7 months, 281 patients developed metastases, and 96 (34.2%), 92 (32.7%), and 93 (33.1%) patients had 1, 2-5, and >5 lesions, respectively. In our study, 27.1% were managed in the MDT clinic that mandated the participation of at least four to five board-certified multidisciplinary experts and patients in decision-making processes, while the rest were managed through diverse MDT approaches such as conferences, tumor board meetings, and discussions conducted via phone calls or email. Management in MDT clinic was significantly associated with more use of radiotherapy (p = 0.003) and more sessions of local therapy (p < 0.001). At the time of MDT clinic, the number of lesions was 1, 2-5, and >5 in 9 (13.6%), 35 (53.1%), and 19 (28.8%) patients, respectively. The most common states were repeat OMD (28.8%) and de novo OMD (27.3%), followed by oligoprogression (15%) and induced OMD (10.6%).

conclusionOur findings suggest that active involvement of patients and radiation oncologists, and surgeons in MDT care has boosted the probability of using local therapies for various types of OMD throughout the course of the disease.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Second PrimaryRectal NeoplasmsSurgeonsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPatient Care TeamRadiation Oncologistsdecision makingmultidisciplinary teamoligometastasispatient outcomesrectal cancersalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID37909227
PMCPMC10709736
OpenAlexW4388112711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.