Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37909076›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

The functional significance of aberrant cervical counts in sloths: insights from automated exhaustive analysis of cervical range of motion.

Luisa J F Merten, Armita R Manafzadeh, Eva C Herbst, Eli Amson, P Sebastián Tambusso, Patrick Arnold, John A Nyakatura

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Luisa J F MertenComparative Zoology, Institute of Biology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Philippstrasse 12/13, 10115 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-1920
Armita R ManafzadehYale Institute for Biospheric Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-7942
Eva C HerbstPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-9695
Eli AmsonStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1474-9613
P Sebastián TambussoDepartamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-5292
Patrick ArnoldInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6310-5876
John A NyakaturaComparative Zoology, Institute of Biology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Philippstrasse 12/13, 10115 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-8684
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMuseum für Naturkunde · DEPlanetary Science Institute · USStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart · DEUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UYUniversity of Potsdam · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides manatees, the suspensory extant 'tree sloths' are the only mammals that deviate from a cervical count (CC) of seven vertebrae. They do so in opposite directions in the two living genera (increased versus decreased CC). Aberrant CCs seemingly reflect neck mobility in both genera, suggesting adaptive significance for their head position during suspensory locomotion and especially increased ability for neck torsion in three-toed sloths. We test two hypotheses in a comparative evolutionary framework by assessing three-dimensional intervertebral range of motion (ROM) based on exhaustive automated detection of bone collisions and joint disarticulation while accounting for interacting rotations of roll, yaw and pitch. First, we hypothesize that the increase of CC also increases overall neck mobility compared with mammals with a regular CC, and vice versa. Second, we hypothesize that the anatomy of the intervertebral articulations determines mobility of the neck. The assessment revealed that CC plays only a secondary role in defining ROM since summed torsion (roll) capacity was primarily determined by vertebral anatomy. Our results thus suggest limited neck rotational adaptive significance of the CC aberration in sloths. Further, the study demonstrates the suitability of our automated approach for the comparative assessment of osteological ROM in vertebral series.

Indexed as

SlothsAnimalsBiological EvolutionBiomechanical PhenomenaLocomotionRange of Motion, ArticularSpinearticular surfacescervical vertebraekinematicsmobilityvertebral biomechanicszygapophyses

Identifiers

PMID37909076
PMCPMC10618861
OpenAlexW4388132011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.