Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37909046›Full record

ArticleCell systems2023

ProGen2: Exploring the boundaries of protein language models.

Erik Nijkamp, Jeffrey A Ruffolo, Eli N Weinstein, Nikhil Naik, Ali Madani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MBPBERT: A Large Language Model for Metal-Binding Peptide Discovery.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolutionary profiles for protein fitness prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik NijkampSalesforce Research, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeffrey A RuffoloProgram in Molecular Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Profluent Bio, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Eli N WeinsteinData Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Nikhil NaikSalesforce Research, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Ali MadaniSalesforce Research, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Profluent Bio, Berkeley, CA, USA. Electronic address: ali@profluent.bio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-based models trained on protein sequences have demonstrated incredible success at classification and generation tasks relevant for artificial-intelligence-driven protein design. However, we lack a sufficient understanding of how very large-scale models and data play a role in effective protein model development. We introduce a suite of protein language models, named ProGen2, that are scaled up to 6.4B parameters and trained on different sequence datasets drawn from over a billion proteins from genomic, metagenomic, and immune repertoire databases. ProGen2 models show state-of-the-art performance in capturing the distribution of observed evolutionary sequences, generating novel viable sequences, and predicting protein fitness without additional fine-tuning. As large model sizes and raw numbers of protein sequences continue to become more widely accessible, our results suggest that a growing emphasis needs to be placed on the data distribution provided to a protein sequence model. Our models and code are open sourced for widespread adoption in protein engineering. A record of this paper's Transparent Peer Review process is included in the supplemental information.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceProteinsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, FactualLanguageProteinsfitness predictionlanguage modelingprotein design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.