Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37909030›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Ecological validity of a deep learning algorithm to detect gait events from real-life walking bouts in mobility-limiting diseases.

Robbin Romijnders, Francesca Salis, Clint Hansen, Arne Küderle, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Andrea Cereatti, Lisa Alcock, Kamiar Aminian, Clemens Becker, Stefano Bertuletti and 39 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors.

Robbin RomijndersDigital Signal Processing and System Theory, Electrical and Information Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Francesca SalisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Clint HansenArbeitsgruppe Neurogeriatrie, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Arne KüderleDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Anisoara Paraschiv-IonescuLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrea CereattiDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Lisa AlcockFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kamiar AminianLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clemens BeckerGesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung, Robert-Bosch Foundation GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefano BertulettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Tecla BonciINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Philip BrownNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Ellen BuckleyINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Alma CantuSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anne-Elie CarsinBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Marco CarusoDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Brian CaulfieldInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Lorenzo ChiariDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ilaria D'AscanioDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia Del DinFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Björn EskofierDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Sara Johansson FernstadSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Marceli Stanislaw FröhlichGrünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Judith Garcia AymerichBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Eran GazitCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Hugo HidenSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Emily HumeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Alison KeoghInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cameron KirkFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Felix KlugeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Sarah KochBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Claudia MazzàINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Dimitrios MegaritisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Encarna Micó-AmigoFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Arne MüllerNovartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Luca PalmeriniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lynn RochesterFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Lars SchwickertGesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung, Robert-Bosch Foundation GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.
Kirsty ScottINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Basil SharrackDepartment of Neuroscience and Sheffield NIHR Translational Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
David SingletonInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Abolfazl SoltaniLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Martin UllrichDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Beatrix VereijkenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ioannis VogiatzisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Alison YarnallFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Gerhard SchmidtDigital Signal Processing and System Theory, Electrical and Information Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Walter MaetzlerArbeitsgruppe Neurogeriatrie, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical assessment of mobility, and walking specifically, is still mainly based on functional tests that lack ecological validity. Thanks to inertial measurement units (IMUs), gait analysis is shifting to unsupervised monitoring in naturalistic and unconstrained settings. However, the extraction of clinically relevant gait parameters from IMU data often depends on heuristics-based algorithms that rely on empirically determined thresholds. These were mainly validated on small cohorts in supervised settings. Methods: Here, a deep learning (DL) algorithm was developed and validated for gait event detection in a heterogeneous population of different mobility-limiting disease cohorts and a cohort of healthy adults. Participants wore pressure insoles and IMUs on both feet for 2.5 h in their habitual environment. The raw accelerometer and gyroscope data from both feet were used as input to a deep convolutional neural network, while reference timings for gait events were based on the combined IMU and pressure insoles data. Results and discussion: The results showed a high-detection performance for initial contacts (ICs) (recall: 98%, precision: 96%) and final contacts (FCs) (recall: 99%, precision: 94%) and a maximum median time error of -0.02 s for ICs and 0.03 s for FCs. Subsequently derived temporal gait parameters were in good agreement with a pressure insoles-based reference with a maximum mean difference of 0.07, -0.07, and <0.01 s for stance, swing, and stride time, respectively. Thus, the DL algorithm is considered successful in detecting gait events in ecologically valid environments across different mobility-limiting diseases.

Indexed as

deep learning (artificial intelligence)free-livinggait analysisgait events detectioninertial measurement unit (IMU)mobility

Identifiers

PMID37909030
PMCPMC10615212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.