ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2023
CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of the
Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Floral stage optimization and immune evasion enhance Agrobacterium-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Turbo-charging crop improvement: harnessing multiplex editing for polygenic trait engineering and beyond.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- An N-terminal domain specifies developmental control by the SMAX1-LIKE family of transcriptional regulators inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Suitability of Real-Time PCR Methods for New Genomic Technique Detection in the Context of the European Regulations: A Case Study in Arabidopsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A comprehensive all-in-one CRISPR toolbox for large-scale screens in plants.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Specificity Testing for NGT PCR-Based Detection Methods in the Context of the EU GMO Regulations.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of theFrontiers in genome editing · 2023Article
- A Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience in CRISPR-Cas9 Experimental Design to Support Reverse Genetic Studies inJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing in plants typically relies on T-DNA plasmids that are mobilized by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.