Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908905›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Association of Inpatient Amlodipine Dose With Renal Complication Rates and Hospital Length of Stay.

Eric R Gottlieb, Stephen S Gottlieb

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric R GottliebHospital Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, USA.
Stephen S GottliebCardiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Correct hospital medication reconciliation is important for continuity of care, but optimal home antihypertensive medication ordering has not been adequately studied. Since excessive hospital blood pressure control is associated with adverse renal and cardiovascular outcomes, we assessed the association of inpatient doses of amlodipine (10mg vs. 5mg) with length of stay and renal failure and fluid and electrolyte disorders (RF/FED). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, clinical and demographic data on patients not initially admitted to the ICU between 2008 and 2019 were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between amlodipine dose during the first 24 hours of admission and RF/FED. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association between amlodipine dose and length of stay when controlling for RF/FED or maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration and other confounders. Results There were 5,932 patients included in this study, and 3,038 of whom received 10mg of amlodipine. A 10mg dose of amlodipine was associated with an increased likelihood of RF/FED (OR: 1.248, 95% CI (1.104, 1.412), p<0.001). It was also associated with a longer length of stay (coef.: 0.338, 95% CI (0.067, 0.609), p=0.015). This was not significant when controlling for RF/FED (dose coef.: 0.197, 95% CI (-0.070, 0.464), p=0.147) or maximum BUN (dose coef.: 0.082, 95% CI (-0.147, 0.312), p=0.482). Interpretation Higher amlodipine dose was associated with longer length of stay, and this is likely mediated by RF/FED. Randomized trials are needed to determine which home blood pressure medications should be ordered in the hospital.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryamlodipinehospital length of stayhypertensionmedication reconciliation

Identifiers

PMID37908905
PMCPMC10613586
OpenAlexW4387220964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.